India Flanagan

Call: 2018

Contact my practice management team

India Flanagan specialises in the Court of Protection, and has a busy and growing practice. She is ranked in both Chambers and Partners (Up and Coming), and the Legal 500 (Leading Junior, Band 5) for Court of Protection (Health and Welfare).

India has been described in the legal directories as being an ‘exceptionally skilled and persuasive barrister’ (Legal 500, 2026); an ‘excellent advocate’ and ‘consistently delivers clear, pragmatic and high-quality advice in complex Court of Protection matters’ (both Chambers and Partners, 2027).

India regularly receives repeat instructions, and is noted for her meticulous approach to her cases, as well as quickly establishing a good rapport with her clients.

Expertise

  • Court of Protection

    India has a busy practice in the Court of Protection, primarily in Health and Welfare cases. She has acted in proceedings up to and including the High Court, and has appeared against King’s Counsel.

    India predominantly represents Local Authorities. She has extensive experience making and resisting COP applications, both in relation to section 16 and 21A proceedings brought under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. She advises Local Authorities at all stages of Court Protection proceedings, and in relation to a broad range of issues, including capacity evidence, care and support plans, restraint plans, application documents, advising on and drafting interim and final orders.

    India has been noted for her conscientious and diligent approach in her Court of Protection work, and has been commended for her clarity in written submissions, and ability to grasp the salient issues of a case, when instructed on an urgent basis.

    To date, her caseload has included proceedings, which concern the following issues:

    • Re AR (Whether restrictions amount to a deprivation of liberty)[2026] EWCOP 45 (T2): whether AR’s care arrangements amounted to a deprivation of liberty under the multifactorial test established in AGNI [2026] UKSC 16;
    • Serious Medical Treatment proceedings in the High Court;
    • Court of Protection Health and Welfare proceedings in the High Court, which concern closed material and injunctions to facilitate engagement with public bodies;
    • Proceedings which involve allegations of forced marriage, and injunctions to prevent family members from removing a vulnerable person from the jurisdiction, or taking steps to arrange for the vulnerable person to marry;
    • Cases which involve the use of TZ-style care plans (where P has capacity to engage in sexual relations, but lacks capacity to make decisions in relation to contact);
    • Capacity in relation to several domains, including capacity to engage in sexual relations; marry; consent to medical treatment; contact; social media and/or internet;
    • Cases which concern conflicting capacity domains (for example if P has capacity to make decisions in relation to care and support, but lacks capacity in relation to residence);
    • Proceedings involving hoarding, and which have parallel possession proceedings;
    • Matters which necessitate the instruction of independent experts and/or independent social workers;
    • Proceedings in the Inherent Jurisdiction of the High Court.

    India also accepts instructions in Property and Affairs matters, in the Court of Protection.