Robert is a public law specialist, with particular expertise in planning and environmental law. He is joint head of the planning team at Cornerstone and is a founding member of Cornerstone Climate.
He has a diverse client base, including private developers and landowners, central and local authorities, public bodies and interest groups, as well as individuals. He acts across a wide range of forums, including planning inquiries and hearings, Local Plan examinations, select committee hearings, as well as statutory challenges and judicial reviews in the higher courts.
Appointed to the Attorney General’s A Panel, he is one of only a small number of planning and environmental specialists trusted to act for Government in its most complex and sensitive cases. He is also one of five counsel selected by the Department for Transport to promote the HS2 Hybrid Bill in Parliament.
Robert has been consistently ranked as a leading junior by the legal directories, where he has been described as “someone that can be trusted; he has the ear of the court” (Chambers 2025), “exceptionally hard-working, collegiate and clever” (Chambers 2024) and a “standout barrister” (Chambers 2023).
Recent cases and inquiries in which Robert has acted include:
Court work
- Ross v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Renewable Energy Systems Ltd [2025] EWHC 1183 (Admin) – High Court statutory review of permission for a large solar farm, the first case to consider national policy on “overplanting”. Leading Ruchi Parekh.
- SBGA v Bristol City Council (2025, judgment pending) – The Bristol Zoo JR – Judicial review of the grant of planning permission for the redevelopment of Bristol Zoo. With Micheal Bedford KC. Rob led on the ground of challenge concerning the correct approach to assessing biodiversity net gain.
- Halton v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2025] J.P.L. 698 – Judicial review of costs decision following a collapsed inquiry, raising a novel point on responsibility for expert evidence. Court of Appeal hearing in November 2025
- Vistry & Fairfax v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2025] P.T.S.R. 60 – Conjoined High Court challenges to refusals of major Green Belt schemes. Raised important issues concerning the approach to development in the Green Belt, including the meaning of “previously developed land” and how decision-makers are to approach benefits of such schemes.
- Test Valley BC v Fiske [2024] EWCA Civ 1541 – Appearing on behalf of a local planning authority in the Court of Appeal concerning grant of permission for a solar park. Clarified the scope of variations that can be made by an application under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Acted for the Borough Council, led by Robin Green.
- Save Our Southbank v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2024] EWHC 3326 (Admin) – The ITV Building JR – defended the Secretary of State’s grant of permission for redevelopment of ITV Studios on London’s Southbank. Raised novel issues on interpretation of the tall buildings policy in the London Plan. Acted for the Secretary of State, leading Ruchi Parekh.
- R. (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd) v Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero [2024] PTSR 1293 – Challenge to the Secretary of State’s Carbon Budget Delivery Plan under the Climate Change Act 2008. Acted for the Secretary of State led by Jonathan Moffett KC.
- Lullington Solar Park Ltd v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2024] EWHC 295 –defended a challenge to refusal of permission for a solar farm. Clarified requirements for considering and assessing alternative sites in solar park schemes. Leading Riccardo Calzavara.
- Bramley Solar Farm Residents Group v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2024] J.P.L. 576 – challenge to an Inspector’s decision to grant permission for a solar farm, raising wide ranging issues, including the extent to which a scheme can be amended on appeal; the adequacy of consultation; and when consideration of alternative sites is required.
- Llandaff North Residents’ Association v Cardiff City Council [2023] Env. L.R. 31 – Judicial review of permission for sewerage works to support 5,000 new homes. Established that necessary infrastructure need not always be treated as part of the project for environmental assessment. Acted for the local authority, leading Alex Williams.
- Leadbetter v Secretary of State for Transport [2023] EWCA Civ 1496 – Challenge in the Court of Appeal to national guidance on kerb heights, supported by charities for the visually impaired. Acted for the Secretary of State.
- Standard Life Assurance Ltd v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2022] EWHC 2632 (Admin) – Resisted a challenge to planning permission for a major residential development in Bristol, including allegations of inspector misconduct.
- Norton v Mendip DC v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2022] EWHC 3432 (Admin) – Statutory challenge to adoption of a Local Plan. Notable because of the active role the Secretary of State in a challenge to a development plan.
- Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government v Ikram [2021] EWCA Civ 2 – Statutory appeal to a planning inspector’s decision to quash an enforcement notice, and grant permission for use of a building as a mosque. The central issues was the extent to which subsequent planning obligations are capable of remedying defects in conditions.
Planning appeals
- Humber Doucy Lane, East Suffolk/Ipswich (2025)– 4-week inquiry into a 660-home cross-boundary scheme, raising complex issues concerning master-planning, replacement of sports provision and adequacy of Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANG). Acted for East Suffolk and Ipswich Councils, leading Lois Lane.
- Land West of Mill Lane, Braintree (2025) – Multi-day hearing into extra-care development on edge of settlement. Acted for Braintree.
- Hartnolls Farm, Tiverton (2024)– 2-week inquiry into major mixed-use development on the edge of Tiverton. Acted for developer.
- Land south of Green Lane, Chesterton (2024) – multi-week inquiry into large residential development. Acted for Wates Developments, co-counsel with Lord Banner
- Windmill Pub, Croydon (2024) – Hearing into proposed redevelopment of London pub. Instructed by Savills on behalf of developer.
- Wood Street Village, Guildford (2024) – Five-day inquiry into a proposed major residential scheme in the Green Belt. Appeared for Guildford Borough Council.
- Land South of Springfields, Braintree (2024) – multi-day hearing into affordable housing exception scheme. Acted for Braintree.
- Recharge One, South Downs National Park (2023) – Two-week inquiry into a novel EV charging and eco-lodges development in the South Downs National Park. Permission granted despite strong opposition. Acted for the promoter, as co-counsel with Lord Banner
Local Plan examinations
- Uttlesford Local Plan (2025) – for the promoting authority (with James Findlay KC).
- Horsham Local Plan (2024) – for Wates Developments.
- Guildford Part 2 Local Plan (2023) – for the promoting authority.
- Braintree Part 2 Local Plan(2022) – for the promoting authority.
- Tonbridge and Malling Local Plan (2022) – for the promoting authority (with Wayne Beglan).
- North Essex Authorities Strategic Local Plans (2020) – for the promoting authorities (with Michael Bedford QC).
- Guildford Local Plan (2019) – for the promoting authority (with James Findlay QC).
- Central Bedfordshire Local Plan (2019) – for a developer/objector.
- Nuneaton Local Plan (2019) – for a developer/objector.
Climate litigation
Rob’s practice involves a wide range of climate-related matters. In this field he acts for and advises promoters, operators, regulators, and government, both central and local. He is a member of Cornerstone Climate. His experience includes:
- “Recharge One” – acting for the promoters of an electric vehicle service-station located in the South Downs National Park which is to be powered and heated entirely by biomethane;
- Promoting HS2 Hybrid Bill in Parliament – HS2 is being designed and built to be the most sustainable high-speed rail network in the world;
- Large scale on-shore wind-farms – appearing at planning inquiries for promoters and planning authorities in England and Wales;
- Advising operators – in relation to the EU Emissions Trading Scheme;
- Restoration obligations – Advising operators and planning authorities in respect of restoration obligations imposed in respect of coal mines (Margam mine, Neath Port Talbot) and oil fields (Wytch Farm)
- Environmental Judicial Review – Appearing in judicial review and statutory challenges to grants of consent for solar farms (Ross v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government; Lullington Solar Park v SSLUHC; Bramley Solar Farm v SSLUHC; Telford & Wrekin Council v SSLUHC; Fiske v Test Valley BC); hydrocarbon exploration (Protect Dunsfold Ltd v SSLUHC); and major-urban extensions (R (Llandaff North Residents’ Association) v Cardiff Council)
Expertise
- Planning and Environment
Rob has a wide-ranging planning and environmental practice.
His case have related to a wide range of proposals including for residential developments, mixed-use proposals, windfarms, solar farms, data-centres, listed buildings, mineral extraction, education facilities and retail developments.
Rob also has significant experience of appearing at Local Plan examinations, acting on behalf of both local planning authorities and objectors.
He often appears in judicial review and statutory challenges to planning decisions in the higher courts acting for private parties, local authorities and the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.
Recent and notable court work in the Planning Court includes:
- Ross v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Renewable Energy Systems Ltd [2025] EWHC 1183 (Admin) – High Court statutory review of permission for a large solar farm, the first case to consider national policy on “overplanting”. Leading Ruchi Parekh.
- SBGA v Bristol City Council (2025, judgment pending) – The Bristol Zoo JR – Judicial review of the grant of planning permission for the redevelopment of Bristol Zoo. With Micheal Bedford KC. Rob led on the ground of challenge concerning the correct approach to assessing biodiversity net gain.
- Halton v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2025] J.P.L. 698 – Judicial review of costs decision following a collapsed inquiry, raising a novel point on responsibility for expert evidence. Court of Appeal hearing in November 2025
- Vistry & Fairfax v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2025] P.T.S.R. 60 – Conjoined High Court challenges to refusals of major Green Belt schemes. Raised important issues concerning the approach to development in the Green Belt, including the meaning of “previously developed land” and how decision-makers are to approach benefits of such schemes.
- Test Valley BC v Fiske [2024] EWCA Civ 1541 – Appearing on behalf of a local planning authority in the Court of Appeal concerning grant of permission for a solar park. Clarified the scope of variations that can be made by an application under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Acted for the Borough Council, led by Robin Green.
- Save Our Southbank v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2024] EWHC 3326 (Admin) – The ITV Building JR – defended the Secretary of State’s grant of permission for redevelopment of ITV Studios on London’s Southbank. Raised novel issues on interpretation of the tall buildings policy in the London Plan. Acted for the Secretary of State, leading Ruchi Parekh.
- Lullington Solar Park Ltd v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2024] EWHC 295 –defended a challenge to refusal of permission for a solar farm. Clarified requirements for considering and assessing alternative sites in solar park schemes. Leading Riccardo Calzavara.
- Bramley Solar Farm Residents Group v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2024] J.P.L. 576 –challenge to an Inspector’s decision to grant permission for a solar farm, raising wide ranging issues, including the extent to which a scheme can be amended on appeal; the adequacy of consultation; and when consideration of alternative sites is required.
- Llandaff North Residents’ Association v Cardiff City Council [2023] Env. L.R. 31 – Judicial review of permission for sewerage works to support 5,000 new homes. Established that necessary infrastructure need not always be treated as part of the project for environmental assessment. Acted for the local authority, leading Alex Williams.
- Standard Life Assurance Ltd v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2022] EWHC 2632 (Admin) – Resisted a challenge to planning permission for a major residential development in Bristol, including allegations of inspector misconduct.
- Norton v Mendip DC v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2022] EWHC 3432 (Admin) – Statutory challenge to adoption of a Local Plan. Notable because of the active role the Secretary of State in a challenge to a development plan.
- Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government v Ikram [2021] EWCA Civ 2 – Statutory appeal to a planning inspector’s decision to quash an enforcement notice, and grant permission for use of a building as a mosque. The central issue was the extent to which subsequent planning obligations are capable of remedying defects in conditions.
Planning appeals
Recent and notable examples of Rob’s inquiry and hearing work includes:
- Humber Doucy Lane, East Suffolk/Ipswich (2025)– 4-week inquiry into a 660-home cross-boundary scheme, raising complex issues concerning master-planning, replacement of sports provision and adequacy of Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANG). Acted for East Suffolk and Ipswich Councils, leading Lois Lane.
- Land West of Mill Lane, Braintree (2025) – Multi-day hearing into extra-care development on edge of settlement. Acted for Braintree.
- Hartnolls Farm, Tiverton (2024)– 2-week inquiry into major mixed-use development on the edge of Tiverton. Acted for developer.
- Land south of Green Lane, Chesterton (2024) – multi-week inquiry into large residential development. Acted for Wates Developments, co-counsel with Lord Banner
- Windmill Pub, Croydon (2024) – Hearing into proposed redevelopment of London pub. Instructed by Savills on behalf of developer.
- Wood Street Village, Guildford (2024) – Five-day inquiry into a proposed major residential scheme in the Green Belt. Appeared for Guildford Borough Council.
- Land South of Springfields, Braintree (2024) – multi-day hearing into affordable housing exception scheme. Acted for Braintree.
- Recharge One, South Downs National Park (2023) – Two-week inquiry into a novel EV charging and eco-lodges development in the South Downs National Park. Permission granted despite strong opposition. Acted for the promoter, as co-counsel with Lord Banner
Local Plan examinations
Rob appears for both promoting authorities and private clients at Local Plan examinations:
- Uttlesford Local Plan (2025) – for the promoting authority (with James Findlay KC).
- Horsham Local Plan (2024) – for Wates Developments.
- Guildford Part 2 Local Plan (2023) – for the promoting authority.
- Braintree Part 2 Local Plan (2022) – for the promoting authority.
- Tonbridge and Malling Local Plan (2022) – for the promoting authority (with Wayne Beglan).
- North Essex Authorities Strategic Local Plans (2020) – for the promoting authorities (with Michael Bedford QC).
- Guildford Local Plan (2019) – for the promoting authority (with James Findlay QC).
- Central Bedfordshire Local Plan (2019) – for a developer/objector.
- Nuneaton Local Plan (2019) – for a developer/objector.
- North Essex Authorities Strategic Local Plans (2020) – for the promoting authorities (with Michael Bedford QC).
- Guildford Local Plan (2019) – for the promoting authority (with James Findlay QC).
- Central Bedfordshire Local Plan (2019) – for a developer/objector.
- Nuneaton Local Plan (2019) – for a developer/objector.
- Craven Local Plan (2018) – for a developer/objector.
- Hart Local Plan (2018) – for developer/objector.
- West Sussex Minerals (2017) – for a landowner/objector.
- Waverley Local Plan Part 1 examination (2017) – for the promoting authority (with Wayne Beglan).
Environmental law
Rob has experience in a wide range of environmental matters, including:
- Solar farms – Rob has appeared in many of the leading court cases which concern national policy on solar farm development, including Ross (national policy on “overplanting”); Lullington and Bramley (national policy on alternative sites)
- Wind farms – both resisting and promoting wind farm schemes. Rob has a particular expertise in relation to wind farm proposals in Wales, having appeared in multiple public inquiries.
- Climate Change Act 2008 – Rob is an expert in the legislative framework established by the 2008 Act, and represented the Government in JR to its Carbon Budget Delivery Plan
- Eco-homes – successfully represented a developer proposing an “eco-home” in the countryside on the basis of the ‘exceptional quality and innovative nature of the design’. A key part of this finding was the energy-efficient design of the proposal.
- Energy from waste – appeared with Mark Lowe QC in a 7-week inquiry into a proposed energy from waste plant in Hertfordshire. This controversial proposal covered a wide variety of issues including UK and European Waste Policy; UK and European renewable energy policy; Green Belt; heritage impacts; traffic and highway and landscape and visual impacts.
- Minerals – appeared for the LPA in a wind farm planning inquiry (Hifynydd Wind Farm) which called for a balance to be struck between benefits of renewable energy and the need to avoid the sterilisation of important mineral resources. He has also appeared at examinations into Minerals Local Plans
- Nuclear energy – acted as part of a team of three barristers from chambers who advised on an application to the (then) Infrastructure Planning Commission in relation to the development of a Nuclear Power Station at Hinkley Point C.
- Oil – advised the owners of Wytch Farm Oilfields, one of the largest onshore oilfields in the UK, in relation to the planning and enforcement law implications of their proposals for increased extraction.
- HS2 – As significant part of Rob’s role in relation to HS2 involves advising on the Environmental Statement for the UK’s largest infrastructure project
Compulsory Purchase Orders
Rob has an expertise in Compulsory Purchase Orders, and is experienced in all stages of the CPO process from drafting of the order and statement of reasons, through to compensation and enforcement matters. For example, from 2014 to 2017, he acted for Canterbury City Council, RSPB and Natural England in relation to the compulsory purchase of the Whitstable Bay Estate, and appeared at the inquiry in 2016.
- High Court interprets national policy on ‘overplanting’ in solar energy schemes19 May 2025
- Test Valley BC v Fiske: Limits on Conditions Modifying Permissions12 Dec 2024
- London Television Centre Redevelopment: Jack Parker and Robert Williams appear in the High Court15 Oct 2024
- Section 73 Permissions: The implications of Finney and Armstrong10 Oct 2024
- In combined judgment, High Court addresses a “smorgasbord” of substantive and procedural issues in Planning Law12 Aug 2024
- High Court to consider lawfulness of Inspectors’ treatment of new 10% BNG requirement in two linked section 288 challenges09 Jul 2024
- High Court finds the UK’s Carbon Budget Delivery Plan Unlawful and requires the Secretary of State to produce a new plan within 12 months07 May 2024
- R (Fiske) v Test Valley Borough Council15 Dec 2023
- Bramley Solar Power Residents Group v SSLUHC17 Nov 2023
- When (if at all) are local planning authorities required to consider whether an application for planning permission is inconsistent with an earlier grant of permission?10 Oct 2023
- If a claim for planning statutory review is filed on time but served out of time because it is issued out of time, the court has no jurisdiction to entertain it.14 Sep 2023
- Necessary infrastructure – not necessarily the same project11 Jul 2023
- Electric Vehicle charging centre planning permission secured in the South Downs National Park31 Mar 2023
- High Court dismisses challenge to planning permission for large mixed-use scheme in Bath25 Oct 2022
- Controversial housing proposal on allocated site dismissed on appeal due to heritage harm with a costs award made against the appellant11 May 2022
- Legal challenges to the Guildford Local Plan rejected09 Dec 2019
- Lewes District Council overturns Housing Delivery Test following judicial review of Secretary of State30 Oct 2019
- Cornerstone Barristers appears for LTDA in challenge to East-West Cycle Superhighway01 Jan 2018
- Permission granted for Judicial Review challenge to Cycle Super Highway01 Jan 2018
- Leeds Group Plc v (1) Leeds City Council; (2) Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, (3) Jones [2012] 1 WLR 156101 Jan 2018
- Hillgrove Paddocks Planning Inquiry (2012)01 Jan 2018
- Balancing waste provision with Green Belt protection01 Jan 2018
- R (on the application of Garner) v Elmbridge Borough Council [2011] Env LR 1001 Jan 2018
- Secretary Of State Refuses Permission For New Barnfield 380 Tkpa RERF01 Jan 2018
- Full scale attack on town and village greens repelled01 Jan 2018
- Requirements of Circular 05/05: Planning Obligations01 Jan 2018
- Neighbourhood Plan Quashed – Boundaries of the ‘Soft Touch’ Approach01 Jan 2018
- DEFRA confirms Whitstable Bay CPO for nature reserve01 Jan 2018
- Court of Appeal considers planning challenges by the French Government01 Jan 2018
- The impact of Daventry ‘on the ground’01 Jan 2018
- Court of Appeal clarifies law relating to certificates of lawfulness of proposed use or development01 Jan 2018
- Housing land supply in plan-making: Waverley Borough Council adopts Local Plan Part 101 Jan 2018
- New Leadership for Cornerstone Barristers Planning and Environment Team15 Jul 2025
- Cornerstone Barristers recognised as leaders in the Planning Magazine Planning Law Survey 202527 Jun 2025
- Chambers UK Bar 2025: Cornerstone Barristers achieve 75 individual rankings across 15 practice areas 17 Oct 2024
- Planning Law Survey 2024: 12 members of chambers highly rated by Planning Magazine28 Jun 2024
- Cornerstone Barristers at MIPIM 202412 Feb 2024
- Cornerstone Barristers achieves record results in Chambers UK Bar Directory 2024 for Planning and Environment24 Oct 2023
- Cornerstone Barristers ranked as a leading set by Chambers & Partners 202419 Oct 2023
- When (if at all) are local planning authorities required to consider whether an application for planning permission is inconsistent with an earlier grant of permission?10 Oct 2023
- Cornerstone Planning Day 2021 – Tickets available20 Sep 2021
- ‘In accordance with the development plan’: a question of judgment or interpretation?06 May 2020
- Planning Law Survey 2020 – Barristers at Cornerstone among the “most-admired”30 Mar 2020
- Lewes District Council overturns Housing Delivery Test following judicial review31 Oct 2019
- Rob Williams will speak at the University of Lisbon about the provision of affordable housing in the United Kingdom and the United States26 Jun 2019
- Four Cornerstone members to start the examination into the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan16 May 2019
- Wales Planning Law Update01 Jan 2018
- Planning Magazine: The Planning Law Survey 201501 Jan 2018
- Public Law and Judicial Review
Rob has a particular interest in administrative and public law and, given the nature of his practice, public law issues pervade much of his work.
As a member of the Attorney General’s ‘A’ Panel, Rob regularly appears in the Administrative and Planning Courts on behalf of government departments. He has also appeared in the higher courts, including the Court of Appeal, on behalf of private parties, and other public bodies.
Many of the cases in which Rob has been involved have raised human rights issues and regularly addresses domestic, European and international jurisprudence.
Examples of his work which have raised public law issues include:
- Halton v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities [2025] J.P.L. 698 – – Judicial review of costs decision following a collapsed planning inquiry, raising a novel point on responsibility of public bodies when calling expert evidence. Court of Appeal hearing in November 2025
- R. (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd) v Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero [2024] PTSR 1293 – Challenge to the Secretary of State’s Carbon Budget Delivery Plan under the Climate Change Act 2008. Acted for the Secretary of State led by Jonathan Moffett KC.
- Leadbetter v Secretary of State for Transport [2023] EWCA Civ 1496 – Challenge in the Court of Appeal to national guidance on kerb heights, supported by charities for the visually impaired. Acted for the Secretary of State.
- Relta Ltd v Greater London Authority [2017] EWHC 671 (Admin) – appeared for the GLA in respect of a judicial review challenge to the decision by the London of Mayor to designated Bromley Town Centre as a Housing Zone. The claim raised issues of interpretation and application of the Mayor’s policy.
- High Court interprets national policy on ‘overplanting’ in solar energy schemes19 May 2025
- Test Valley BC v Fiske: Limits on Conditions Modifying Permissions12 Dec 2024
- London Television Centre Redevelopment: Jack Parker and Robert Williams appear in the High Court15 Oct 2024
- Section 73 Permissions: The implications of Finney and Armstrong10 Oct 2024
- In combined judgment, High Court addresses a “smorgasbord” of substantive and procedural issues in Planning Law12 Aug 2024
- High Court to consider lawfulness of Inspectors’ treatment of new 10% BNG requirement in two linked section 288 challenges09 Jul 2024
- High Court finds the UK’s Carbon Budget Delivery Plan Unlawful and requires the Secretary of State to produce a new plan within 12 months07 May 2024
- Net Zero Challenge: Round 2 20 Feb 2024
- R (Fiske) v Test Valley Borough Council15 Dec 2023
- If a claim for planning statutory review is filed on time but served out of time because it is issued out of time, the court has no jurisdiction to entertain it.14 Sep 2023
- Electric Vehicle charging centre planning permission secured in the South Downs National Park31 Mar 2023
- Lewes District Council overturns Housing Delivery Test following judicial review of Secretary of State30 Oct 2019
- Court of Appeal considers planning challenges by the French Government01 Jan 2018
- Court of Appeal clarifies law relating to certificates of lawfulness of proposed use or development01 Jan 2018
- New Leadership for Cornerstone Barristers Planning and Environment Team15 Jul 2025
- Cornerstone Barristers recognised as leaders in the Planning Magazine Planning Law Survey 202527 Jun 2025
- Chambers UK Bar 2025: Cornerstone Barristers achieve 75 individual rankings across 15 practice areas 17 Oct 2024
- Emma Dring and Ruchi Parekh appointed to the Attorney General’s B Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown, with Rowan Clapp appointed to C Panel02 Aug 2023
- Four Cornerstone members to start the examination into the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan16 May 2019
- Junior Members appointed to Attorney General’s Panel of Counsel01 Jan 2018
- Junior Counsel to the Crown Appointments01 Jan 2018
- Planning Magazine: The Planning Law Survey 201501 Jan 2018
- Cornerstone Climate
Rob specialises in climate law. He is a founding member of Cornerstone Climate and regularly advises developers, regulators, central and local governments, NGOs and individuals in relation to climate-related matters.
Rob has appeared in several leading court cases in which climate related issues were front and centre of the dispute. This includes judicial review challenges to the government’s Carbon Budget Delivery Plan under the Climate Change Act 2008 (Friends of the Earth v Secretary of State for Energy Security); the grant of permission for hydrocarbon exploration (Protect Dunsfold Ltd v SSLUHC); as well as statutory challenges concerning national policy on renewable energy developments (Ross – on “overplanting” of solar farms; Lullington and Bramley – on alternative site assessments); and EIA of major-urban extensions (R (Llandaff North Residents’ Association) v Cardiff Council – on the nature of a ‘project’)
His inquiry work is often concerned with climate related projects. This has included multiple inquiries concerning large scale wind farms; promoting a large scale energy from waste plants the promotion of a novel electric vehicle service-station located in the South Downs National Park, powered entirely by biomethane; and proposals involving eco-homes
- High Court interprets national policy on ‘overplanting’ in solar energy schemes19 May 2025
- In combined judgment, High Court addresses a “smorgasbord” of substantive and procedural issues in Planning Law12 Aug 2024
- High Court finds the UK’s Carbon Budget Delivery Plan Unlawful and requires the Secretary of State to produce a new plan within 12 months07 May 2024
- Net Zero Challenge: Round 2 20 Feb 2024
- When (if at all) are local planning authorities required to consider whether an application for planning permission is inconsistent with an earlier grant of permission?10 Oct 2023
- Electric Vehicle charging centre planning permission secured in the South Downs National Park31 Mar 2023
- New Leadership for Cornerstone Barristers Planning and Environment Team15 Jul 2025
- Cornerstone Barristers recognised as leaders in the Planning Magazine Planning Law Survey 202527 Jun 2025
- Chambers UK Bar 2025: Cornerstone Barristers achieve 75 individual rankings across 15 practice areas 17 Oct 2024
- Cornerstone Barristers at MIPIM 202412 Feb 2024
- Cornerstone Barristers achieves record results in Chambers UK Bar Directory 2024 for Planning and Environment24 Oct 2023
- When (if at all) are local planning authorities required to consider whether an application for planning permission is inconsistent with an earlier grant of permission?10 Oct 2023
- Inside the launch of Cornerstone Climate11 Jul 2023