Jack Barber was called to the Bar in 2019 and specialises in planning, local government and public law. He has a broad court, inquiry and advisory practice and a wide client base, including local government, housing associations, developers, local interest groups and individuals. He has appeared in the Court of Appeal, High Court and County Court, the First-tier Tribunal and in public inquiries. Since November 2023, Jack has been registered with the Attorney General’s civil junior junior scheme.
Professional background
Jack has previously acquired both public and private sector legal and policy experience.
Before pupillage, Jack worked as a researcher for Dr John Stanton’s monograph ‘Law, Localism and the Constitution’, exploring the constitutional relationship between central and local government, and as lead paralegal for government decision-making at the Infected Blood Inquiry.
During his legal studies, Jack was a legal volunteer in Islington Law Centre’s housing team, where he supported a solicitor’s advice clinics. He also represented school pupils in school exclusion hearings via the School Exclusion Project.
Jack was selected as Hanover Communications’ inaugural Mackay Award winner in 2016. He spent five weeks in Washington, D.C. during the presidential election and produced a report considering how electoral authorities might adapt to the latest innovations in political campaigning.
Jack also worked within Hanover’s government and public affairs team advising various multi-national clients on political, regulatory, legislative, and reputational issues, including on major infrastructure, environmental, and public service outsourcing matters.
Expertise
- Public Law and Judicial Review
Jack Barber has been instructed by local authorities at pre-action, permission and substantive stages of judicial review proceedings and planning statutory challenges.
Recent instructions include:
- Appearing (with Wayne Beglan) on behalf of a local authority claimant in the judicial review of the Home Secretary’s decision to use a former military site to accommodate asylum seekers.
- Representing a respondent local authority in a statutory challenge pursuant to s.113 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 to the adoption of its local plan (with Wayne Beglan).
- Advising for various local authorities on the options and merits of challenging decisions to accommodate asylum seekers in hotels.
Jack also appeared (with Andrew Lane) in R (SO) v Thanet D.C. [2023] EWCA Civ 398 in a judicial review claim heard by the Court of Appeal which established the principle that a temporary consent to occupation must be withdrawn before service of a direction for unauthorised campers to leave land pursuant to s.77 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. He has also advised a local authority on the correct approach to discharging the public sector equality duty in the context of issuing a direction to unauthorised encampments.
Jack was instructed by West Midlands Police in relation to parallel applications under the Policing and Crime Act 2009 for gang injunctions against two rival gangs. He worked closely with other members of chambers and the Police’s legal services team to assist with active case management and has appeared as counsel in several case management hearings and interim applications to extend interim relief. Jack was led by Kuljit Bhogal KC, Andrew Lane and Sarah Salmon in three multi-day final hearings of the applications and has also advised on committal proceedings.
- High Court to hear significant statutory challenge against refusal of planning permission to demolish and rebuild M&S Oxford Street store13 Feb 2024
- High Court grants permission to appeal in challenge to Home Sectary’s decision to use decommissioned military sites to accommodate asylum seekers07 Dec 2023
- High Court hears three challenges to Home Secretary’s use of former military bases to accommodate asylum seekers31 Oct 2023
- Permission granted in judicial review challenges to use of former military bases for asylum accommodation14 Jul 2023
- Court of Appeal to hear challenge relating to injunction preventing use of RAF Wethersfield for asylum seeker accommodation12 Jun 2023
- Supreme Court to hear gang injunction challenge30 Jan 2023
- Housing
Jack’s recent housing work includes:
- Advising on the regulatory implications for local housing authorities where hotels are being used to accommodate people seeking asylum in their area (on various occasions, both with Dean Underwood and unled).
- Drafting numerous new and converted written statements of secure occupation contracts for use by social landlords in Wales following the implementation of the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 (with Sarah Salmon and Alistair Cantor).
- Appearing for the successful respondent social landlord in an appeal against the court’s refusal to suspend a warrant for eviction.
- Advising and representing a Local Housing Authority in relation to a s.204 Housing Act 1996 appeal.
- Appearing for the successful respondent Local Housing Authority in a First-tier Tribunal appeal of the LHA’s decision to grant a licence for a House in Multiple Occupation.
- Appearing in possession and injunction proceedings in the County Court for local authorities and private registered providers of social housing.
During pupillage, Jack worked on numerous housing matters, including those relating to licensing and Houses in Multiple Occupation. With Andrew Lane, Jack gained experience of a range of matters relating to housing, homelessness and allocations, and licensing, and he observed a wide range of proceedings from housing possession trials to appellate advocacy in the higher courts. His experience included:
- Drafting a skeleton argument for the Court of Appeal, which considered the proper approach to retrospective compliance with the public sector equality duty in the context of possession proceedings.
- Drafting a skeleton argument for a homelessness appeal under section 204 Housing Act 1996.
- Drafting representations to the Upper Tribunal in relation to an appeal against the First-tier Tribunal’s decision to uphold a penalty imposed on a landlord for its alleged failure to licence a House in Multiple Occupation.
- Housing Newsletter | February 202426 Feb 2024
- Duty of candour in the context of housing related judicial review claims26 Feb 2024
- Things can only get better?26 Feb 2024
- Gang and anti-social behaviour injunctions: Supreme Court confirms the standard of proof to be applied19 Jul 2023
- Better Late Than Never? First Reading of Renters (Reform) Bill in Parliament18 May 2023
- Accommodating Asylum Seekers: Legal Issues Arising from the Use of Hotel Accommodation12 Dec 2022
- Effective Legal Responses to Gang-Related Violence and Drug Dealing 25 Oct 2022
- Procedural rules for claims under the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 – due to come into effect 1 December 202229 Jul 2022
- Planning and Environment
Overview
Jack Barber has a growing planning practice, and has been instructed by local authorities, developers and interested parties in relation to planning inquiries, prospective judicial review claims and planning statutory reviews and appeals, as well as advisory work.
Court
Jack is instructed (with Wayne Beglan) by Waverley Borough Council in House v Waverley B.C and Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities in a s.113 PCPA 2004 statutory challenge to the decision of the Council to adopt its Local Plan Part 2(LPP2).
Jack has, with Wayne Beglan, been instructed by Braintree District Council in relation to the Secretary of State for the Home Department’s proposed use of MDP Wethersfield to accommodate asylum seekers. He appeared (with Wayne Beglan) in Braintree District Council v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor. [2023] EWCA Civ 727, in the Council’s appeal arising out of an application for an injunction under s.187B TCPA 1990. Jack was separately instructed, with Wayne Beglan, to intervene in the appeal by written submissions on behalf of Rother District Council. He has also recently represented Braintree District Council in related judicial review proceedings (with Wayne Beglan).
Inquiries
He has experience both as a led junior and as sole counsel at inquiries involving a variety of topical issues including Green Belt development, heritage, highways, design, water resources, landscape character and visual impact. Jack’s recent inquiry experience includes:
- Appearing, led by Ben Du Feu, for the Local Planning Authority in a twelve-day recovered s.78 appeal against the non-determination of planning permission for a substantial mixed, employment-led scheme comprising c.425 residential units, retail space and offices/commercial lab space (Appeal Ref. 3315611).
- Appearing unled for the Rule 6 party in an eight-day recovered s.78 appeal against the refusal of outline planning permission for a 1715-capacity prison in Leicestershire (Appeal Ref. 3300227, decision outstanding).
- Appearing, led by Josef Cannon, for the Rule 6 party in an eight-day recovered s.78 appeal against the refusal of outline planning permission for a 1715-capacity prison in Lancashire (Pro Bono) (Appeal Ref. 3295556, decision outstanding).
- Appearing unled for the Local Planning Authority in a four-day s.78 appeal against the refusal of planning permission for a 58-dwelling residential development.
- Appearing, led by Jack Parker, for the Local Planning Authority in a four-week s.174 enforcement appeal in relation to a complex travelling showpeople’s site.
- Involvement (both led and unled) in several ongoing section 78 and enforcement appeals by other members of chambers representing local planning authorities.
Advisory
Jack’s other recent planning work includes:
- Advising on challenging a listing decision and on general matters relating to prospects of securing listed building consent for demolition of Grade-II building (with Richard Ground KC).
- Advising on the planning implications of accommodating people seeking asylum in contingency hotel accommodation (both with Dean Underwood and unled).
- Appearing on behalf of a Local Planning Authority in the Crown Court in relation to the breach of an enforcement notice.
- Advising on a proposed judicial review of a Local Planning Authority’s alleged failure to withdraw an enforcement notice under s.173A Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (with Emmaline Lambert).
- Advising local residents on an objection to a planning application for a significant housing development adjacent to a designated conservation area.
As a pupil, Jack built awareness of the specific challenges facing developers, local authorities, landowners, and residents’ groups throughout the planning process. He engaged with many aspects of the development and use of land, including planning, property, public rights of way, and local government law, by:
- Drafting pre-action protocol response letters, Statements of Facts and Grounds, Summary Grounds of Resistance, and skeleton arguments associated with judicial review challenges in the Planning Court, including in relation to public rights of way, habitats, and environmental impact assessments.
- Drafting advice on matters engaging issues relating to highways, the interpretation and legality of planning conditions, environmental regulation, compulsory purchase, and boundary disputes.
- Assisting with the preparation of a party’s submissions in the DCO process for the major infrastructure project of a proposed twin reactor nuclear power station at Sizewell C.
- Drafting advice on a range of planning and environmental matters, including on emerging issues relating to Habitats Regulations Assessments relating to phosphates and nutrient neutrality.
- Drafting skeleton arguments, including in relation to the Community Infrastructure Levy and Assets of Community Value.
- Assisting with research and preparation in relation to several planning inquiries.
- High Court to hear significant statutory challenge against refusal of planning permission to demolish and rebuild M&S Oxford Street store13 Feb 2024
- Planning hearing to consider impact of proposals on heritage assets with royal connection18 Jan 2024
- High Court grants permission to appeal in challenge to Home Sectary’s decision to use decommissioned military sites to accommodate asylum seekers07 Dec 2023
- High Court upholds Waverley Borough Council’s decision to adopt Part 2 of its Local Plan as lawful28 Nov 2023
- High Court to hear challenge to local authority’s decision to adopt local plan document 07 Nov 2023
- High Court hears three challenges to Home Secretary’s use of former military bases to accommodate asylum seekers31 Oct 2023
- Court of Appeal to hear challenge relating to injunction preventing use of RAF Wethersfield for asylum seeker accommodation12 Jun 2023
- Inquiry on 124-unit residential scheme on allocated site in setting of Guildford Cathedral to close25 Mar 2024
- Ben Du Feu and Jack Barber begin inquiry into land north of Cambridge North Station06 Jun 2023
- Accommodating Asylum Seekers: Legal Issues Arising from the Use of Hotel Accommodation12 Dec 2022
- Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill 2022-23 – An overview17 May 2022
- Cornerstone Climate
Jack is a member of Cornerstone Climate and available to be instructed on climate-related matters.
His judicial review experience has involved EIA matters, including being led in representing a claimant advancing grounds challenging a decision-maker’s reliance on an environmental screening direction. Jack has advised local interest groups in relation to potential challenges to screening directions. He has also drafted advice on a range of matters relating to water regulation, habitat regulations assessments and nutrient neutrality issues.
As a pupil, Jack gained experience of the Development Consent Order process in relation to the Sizewell C nuclear power station.
- Information Law
Jack is available to be instructed on information law matters. He has been instructed on behalf of the Information Commissioner’s Office to draft several responses in Freedom of Information appeals to the First-tier Tribunal. He has also advised local authorities in relation to requests for environmental information.