A versatile silk who maintains a deliberately broad practice, Philip is a recognised leader in commercial litigation (including civil fraud, bank matters and tax disputes), all areas of government law (including planning, elections, licensing and finance) and data protection/FOI/privacy law.
Experience and expertise
Philip has extensive court and tribunal experience to the highest appellate levels. Recent major court appearances have variously been concerned with financial services, bank matters, civil fraud, freezing injunctions, local government law, judicial review, planning, environmental law, privacy and data protection, and freedom of information. In addition, Philip has appeared at numerous major planning and environmental inquiries. Thorough preparation, effective use of team resources and client commitment are combined with an open style to ensure clear advice and convincing representation.
Publications
Philip is the author of the leading practitioner text on Freedom of Information (FOI) and similar rights. Now in its sixth edition, Information Rights has been widely acclaimed and is regularly cited. He is the editor of the local government and local government finance volumes of Halsbury’s Laws of England and the author of the volumes of Atkins’s Court Forms on election law, economic torts, misfeasance in public office and evidence.
Expertise
- Commercial, Civil Fraud and Regulation
Philip has always had a strong civil and commercial litigation practice. He has combined this with his other areas of practice, including tax, to deliver successful client outcomes. These have included extending the law to protect client interests (e.g. Total Network SL v HMRC Revenue, where unlawful means conspiracy was used to recover unpaid tax liability, and Hone v Abbey Forwarding dealing with damages on a cross-undertaking given for a freezing injunction). He is a highly experienced trial advocate who will lead a team to ensure that client resources are used effectively and efficiently.
Professional directories have rated him as a leading silk in a number of areas of law, with published client comments for the last 12 months including:
- “Grasps complex legal issues, and is meticulous in his preparation.”
- “He has always been clear and concise in providing advice. He is very thorough in his analysis of matters.”
- “He is a very good silk who is aggressive, will fight his client’s corner and will go the extra mile to get the desired result. He’s very focused on what can be achieved, and is very creative.”
- “He is careful, quietly spoken and superbly well informed.”
- “Creative and tenacious. He is a very strong trial lawyer, who is both personable and a great advocate.”
Regulatory Law
The marriage of two of Philip’s longstanding core areas of practice (commercial law and public law), regulatory law is a central part of his practice. This has seen him already in groundbreaking appellate litigation in relation to collective investment scheme and the Financial Conduct Authority (Asset Land Investment v FCA, the first case on the topic going to the Supreme Court).
Professional directories have rated him as a leading silk in a number of areas of law, with published client comments for the last 12 months including:
- “Grasps complex legal issues, and is meticulous in his preparation.”
- “He has always been clear and concise in providing advice. He is very thorough in his analysis of matters.”
- “He is a very good silk who is aggressive, will fight his client’s corner and will go the extra mile to get the desired result. He’s very focused on what can be achieved, and is very creative.”
- “He is careful, quietly spoken and superbly well informed.”
- “Creative and tenacious. He is a very strong trial lawyer, who is both personable and a great advocate.”
Data protection
Philip is a leading expert in the area of data protection and personal privacy. He was invited by the Leveson Inquiry to give expert written and oral evidence on data protection and the protection of personal privacy. That evidence formed the basis of numerous recommendations by Lord Justice Leveson. Philip regularly represents individuals, ensuring wherever possible that their interests are secured without the spotlight of litigation.
Rated as a leading silk in this area of law in both professional directories. Published client comments include:
- “‘His knowledge of and enthusiasm for the subject are prodigious.”
- “An eminent name in the field, who is recognised for his considerable depth of knowledge and for being the author of a definitive data protection text, ‘Information Rights: Law and Practice’.”
- “He is excellent, user-friendly and willing to look at innovative ways of making data protection law work for clients.”
Philip lectures regularly on data protection.
- Northamber PLC v Genee World Ltd & Ors01 May 2024
- Upham & Ors v HSBC UK Bank PLC26 Apr 2024
- Philip Coppel KC’s Eclipse Litigation featured in The Lawyer’s Top 20 cases of 202410 Jan 2024
- Shaw v Estate of Martin Wood04 May 2023
- R (Beech Developments (Manchester) Ltd & others) v HMRC04 May 2023
- Lombard North Central plc v European Skyjets Ltd (in liquidation)30 Mar 2022
- Raja v McMillan21 Jul 2021
- Raja v McMillan22 Apr 2020
- Lombard North Central Plc v European Skyjets Ltd20 Mar 2020
- Rogachev v Goryainov14 Jun 2019
- OWD Ltd (t/a Birmingham Cash and Carry) & Anor v HMRC12 Jun 2019
- Chalfont St Peter Parish Council v Holy Cross Sisters Trustees Incorporated07 May 2019
- LF2 Ltd v Supperstone & Anor (Administrators of Pennyfeathers Ltd)11 Jul 2018
- Rocker v Full Circle Asset Management23 Nov 2017
- Ackerman v Thornhill & Ors26 Jan 2017
- Norcross & Ors v Georgallides (Estate of)02 Aug 2015
- National Crime Agency v Azam & Ors31 Jul 2014
- Abbey Forwarding Ltd (In Liquidation) v Hone11 Dec 2013
- Financial Services Authority v Asset L I Inc (t/a Asset Land Investment Inc) & Ors09 Feb 2013
- Bampton Property Group Ltd & Ors v King (HM Revenue & Customs officer) & Ors24 Feb 2012
- Seabrook Warehousing Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners16 Jul 2009
- Huntingwood Trading Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs21 Jan 2009
- Ewing v Secretary of State for Justice19 Dec 2008
- Total Network SL v HM Revenue & Customs12 Mar 2008
- Oakley v Osiris Trustees Ltd & Ors (Isle Of Man)14 Jan 2008
- Planning and Environment
From the outset, Philip’s practice has had a large planning component. Prior to taking silk, he had for more than 10 years regularly been instructed by the Treasury Solicitor as one of their go-to counsel on court planning appeals. Since then he has been instructed on more important cases, most recently in the Supreme Court on discontinuance notices and hazardous substances. He is also frequently instructed by and against local planning authorities. Planning inquiry experience includes windfarm developments. Mastery of technical matters saw him instructed by the Ministry of Defence in significant interventions to to protect the operation of defence radars.
Philip has a wide-ranging environmental law practice, covering matters such as habitats and species protection, contaminated land, air quality, waste, access to environmental information, statutory and common law nuisance and all aspects of environment impact assessment, strategic environmental assessment and environmental permitting. Recent cases include HSE v Wolverhampton CC, dealing with hazardous substances, and Perry v Newmark Properties, dealing with screening opinions.
Professional directories have rated him as a leading silk in a number of areas of law, with published client comments for the last 12 months including:
- “Grasps complex legal issues, and is meticulous in his preparation.”
- “He has always been clear and concise in providing advice. He is very thorough in his analysis of matters.”
- “He is a very good silk who is aggressive, will fight his client’s corner and will go the extra mile to get the desired result. He’s very focused on what can be achieved, and is very creative.”
- “He is careful, quietly spoken and superbly well informed.”
- “Creative and tenacious. He is a very strong trial lawyer, who is both personable and a great advocate.”
Philip is the author of the leading practitioner text on environmental information, Information Rights (5th Ed), variously described in reviews as “a scholarly work of intensely practical use”, as a “magisterial work, comprehensive and incisive” and as “encyclopaedic and authoritative.”
- R (oao Waverley Borough Council) v Waverley Borough Council Counting Officer13 Mar 2024
- High Court dismisses planning fraud claim08 May 2019
- Going underground – High Court shines a light on basement development rights01 Jan 2018
- R (on the application of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (2015)01 Jan 2018
- Public Law and Judicial Review
With over 20 years’ experience in all aspects of public law, this is a mainstay area of Philip’s practice with regular instructions both from those challenging decisions of public authorities and from public authorities seeking to defend such challenges. Particular specialist aspects of judicial review in which he has both expertise and experience include:
- Claims involving customs, tax and excise. Recent reported cases include: Bampton v HMRC (corporations tax, discretions, legitimate expectations etc), Daniel v HMRC (residency, concessions etc), Millenium Cash & Carry v HMRC (excise, seizure etc) and, on the other side, Seabrook Warehousing v HMRC (judicial review of delegated legislation).
- Claims involving pharmaceutical provision, doctors and dentists contracts. Reported cases include Assura Pharmacy v Moss and Hussain v Secretary of State for Health.
- Traffic regulation including parking. Reported cases include Djanogly v Westminster CC (motorcycle charges) and LB Camden v Parking Adjudicator (parking charges).
- Social care: B v Cornwall Council
Philip is a rated silk in the practice area, with current directory entries in this field describing him as:
- “…a very good silk who is aggressive, will fight his client’s corner and will go the extra mile to get the desired result. He’s very focused on what can be achieved, and is very creative.”
- “He is careful, quietly spoken and superbly well informed.”
- “Creative and tenacious.”
Philip co-authored (with Saima Hanif of 39 Essex Street) Jordan’s Tribunal Practice. Reviews have described it as being “what will probably become the leading textbook on the current tribunal structure and an indispensable guide for those who act for both appellants and respondents alike.”
Local Authority Governance and Services
Philip is an experienced local government lawyer. In addition to working for or against many local authorities across the country in his other core areas (planning, judicial review, election law, information rights and licensing), he regularly advises monitoring officers on governance matters.
He is recommended in the current editions of directories in this area of the law, and published client commendations include: “He has always been clear and concise in providing advice” and “He is very thorough in his analysis of matters.”
Information Law
Philip has appeared in most of the important cases involving the Freedom of Information Act, including Kennedy v Charity Commission (Supreme Court’s consideration of whether the ECHR guaranteed journalists any rights to government-held information), Browning v ICO (challenging the use of closed hearings in FOIA appeals) and Corporate Officer of the House of Commons v Leapman (MP’s expenses). He has successfully established the principle of commercial confidentiality as a ECHR right to override statutory disclosure obligations (Veolia v Nottinghamshire CC). His knowledge of the area extends to the less well-known statutory and common law rights of access (see e.g Perry v Newmark Properties), including medical records.
Rated as a leading silk in this area of law in both professional directories. Published client comments include:
- “His knowledge of and enthusiasm for the subject are prodigious.”
- “An eminent name in the field, who is recognised for his considerable depth of knowledge and for being the author of a definitive data protection text, ‘Information Rights: Law and Practice’.”
Philip is the author of the leading practitioner text in the area, Information Rights, already in its 5th edition, variously described in reviews as “a scholarly work of intensely practical use”, as a “magisterial work..comprehensive and incisive” and as “encyclopaedic and authoritative.”
Data Protection
Philip is a leading expert in the area of data protection and personal privacy. He was invited by the Leveson Inquiry to give expert written and ora evidence on data protection and the protection of personal privacy. That evidence formed the basis of numerous recommendations by Lord Justice Leveson. Philip regularly represents individuals, ensuring wherever possible that their interests are secured without the spotlight of litigation.
Published client comments include:“He is excellent, user-friendly and willing to look at innovative ways of making data protection law work for clients.”
Philip lectures regularly on data protection.
Election Law
Election law has always been a central part of Philip’s practice. With more than 20 years’ experience of this specialised area of the law, he has appeared in many of the major election trials, including successfully defending the returning officer in the Birmingham postal ballot rigging trials and the appeals that followed, and the registration officer in the prisoner-voting rights claim. Regularly instructed by returning officers as well as by the Electoral Commission, he is also retained by returning officers to provide advice and assistance in the run-up to elections, on election night questions and following the count.
He has lectured for the Association of Electoral Administrators and he has written the last three editions of the elections law volume of Atkin’s Court Forms, including a total re-write of the precedents.
Philip understands the special requirements of this area of the law, with the need for quick authoritative advice. Arrangements can be made to ensure that this can be delivered, whatever the hour.
- R (oao Waverley Borough Council) v Waverley Borough Council Counting Officer13 Mar 2024
- Moss v Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames & Information Commissioner04 Dec 2023
- Delo v Information Commissioner12 Oct 2023
- Philip Coppel KC and Sam Fowles instructed in Parliamentary Elections Inquiry24 Jul 2023
- R (Beech Developments (Manchester) Ltd & others) v HMRC04 May 2023
- Heathrow Airport Ltd v Information Commissioner28 Jun 2021
- Electoral Commission defeats Labour Party’s claim for judicial review31 Mar 2021
- Liberal Democrats & The Scottish National Party v ITV Broadcasting Ltd29 Nov 2019
- General Election: SNP seek judicial review of exclusion from the leaders debate18 Nov 2019
- Public authorities’ powers to monitor and publish – the EU referendum case13 Nov 2019
- High Court dismisses planning fraud claim08 May 2019
- Perry v Newmark Properties Ltd & Ors23 May 2014
- Lock v Leicester City Council25 Jul 2012
- London Borough of Camden v The Parking Adjudicator & Ors18 Feb 2011
- Hussain v Secretary of State for the Health Department20 Dec 2010
- Health & Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council & Anor05 Nov 2010
- Djanogly v City of Westminster16 Jul 2010
- Kennedy v Information Commissioner19 Jan 2010
- Chester v Secretary of State for Justice and another24 Oct 2009
- B v Cornwall County Council & Anor16 Aug 2009
- Kaplan v Secretary of State for the Home Department19 Mar 2009
- Corporate Officer of the House of Commons v The Information Commissioner & Ors19 Jan 2009
- Secretary of State for Education and Health v KM14 May 2008
- Assura Pharmacy Ltd, R (on the application of) v National Health Services Litigation Authority (Family Health Services Appeal Unit)21 Feb 2008
- T v Secretary of State for the Home Department18 Dec 2007
- Corby Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government31 Jul 2007
- Looe Fuels Ltd v Looe Harbour Commissioners [2007]27 Apr 2007
- A v B Council07 Mar 2007
- Robinson v Torridge District Council [2006]27 Apr 2006
- R v Cornwall County Council05 Dec 2005
- Lunn v HM Prison Moorland [2005]25 Oct 2005
- Grierson v Atlantic Broadcasting Ltd & Ors26 Aug 2005
- Secretary of State for Education & Skills v Mairs25 May 2005
- The Return of Onshore Wind09 Jul 2024
- Philip Coppel KC and Sam Fowles instructed in Parliamentary Elections Inquiry24 Jul 2023
- Philip Coppel QC and Tom Cosgrove QC succeed as Joint Heads of Chambers01 Apr 2020
- Cornerstone Barristers nominated for the Legal 500 UK Awards 202027 Nov 2019
- Cornerstone’s Electoral Legislation 201601 Jan 2018
- Philip Coppel QC interviewed on the One Show01 Jan 2018
- Journal of Planning & Environmental Law – Confidential information in planning applications01 Jan 2018
- Planning Magazine: The Planning Law Survey 201501 Jan 2018
- Licensing
An important component of Philip’s practice is licensing law. Notable recent cases have included representing the Royal Albert Hall in the Court of Appeal in Corporation of the Hall of Arts and Sciences v Albert Court Residents’ Association, enabling boxing matches to take place in the Hall.
- Information Law
Philip Coppel KC is a leading silk in this area and he has been instructed in high-profile cases, in particular in relation to data breaches.
Philip is the author of the leading practitioner text on Freedom of Information (FOI) and similar rights. Now in its fifth edition, Information Rights has been widely acclaimed and is regularly cited.
- R (oao Waverley Borough Council) v Waverley Borough Council Counting Officer13 Mar 2024
- Moss v Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames & Information Commissioner04 Dec 2023
- Delo v Information Commissioner12 Oct 2023
- Suffering, damage, the GDPR – and all that05 May 2023
- Heathrow Airport Ltd v Information Commissioner28 Jun 2021
- R (Morris) v Health Service Commissioner & Anor02 Dec 2014
- Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd02 Dec 2014
- Perry v Newmark Properties Ltd & Ors23 May 2014
- Devon and Cornwall Autistic Community Trust (t/a Spectrum) v Pyrah10 Aug 2012
- Information Rights: A Practitioner’s Guide to Data Protection, Freedom of Information and other Information Rights 6th ed21 Sep 2023
- Information Rights by Philip Coppel QC will be published this month18 May 2020
- What Changes for the UK Data Protection Legislation? GDPR and Data Protection Act 201824 May 2018