Ranjit has a varied practice, with particular specialisms in local government, public law and judicial review, property, housing, licensing, Court of Protection, and commercial law.
Ranjit is ranked as a leading silk by Chambers and Partners for real estate litigation, social housing and local government law. He is also ranked as a leading silk by Legal 500 for property litigation, social housing law and licensing law.
In his public sector work, Ranjit acts predominantly for local authorities, housing associations, waste authorities and health bodies. In his private sector property work, he acts for the full range of clients, from leading land owners, developers and the reversioners of multi-million pound developments, through to individual home owners and long lessees.
His local authority work spans more than 25 years, and takes in the full range of authorities’ functions and activities, no matter how esoteric or niche. Ranging from the private (land, contracts, injunctions, tortious liability), to the public (vires, democracy, equalities, consultation, procurement) and everything in between (such as rating, council tax, finance, highways, local land charges, allotments), Ranjit’s local government knowledge and experience is unrivalled.
Ranjit works quickly and collaboratively. He provides practical cost-effective advice designed for commercial and pragmatic solutions. He is happy for clients to run points by him on an informal basis by phone, and hold consultations wherever is most convenient. He is well used to receiving instructions in whatever form time and circumstance allow, and drafting and reviewing documents as a matter of urgency to ensure the tightest of deadlines are met. He does not stand on ceremonies.
Ranjit is an attractive and concise advocate, as much at home in the Court of Appeal as before the First Tier Tribunal. He understands the importance of structure to oral submissions and has an acute awareness of when the client’s best interests are served by relative brevity, a dollop of common sense and a dash of humour. Which, thankfully, they often are.
Ranjit has a B.A. in Law from University College, Oxford. He jogs slowly but DJs up a storm.
Expertise
- Court of Protection
Ranjit acts for local authorities in Court of Protection cases, and in the High Court. These include difficult and weighty ‘best interests’ cases.
As a highly experienced, quick and economic civil litigator, Ranjit brings these skills to bear in the COP jurisdiction where experience suggests to him that other parties may be less concerned about the length or costs of hearings and proceedings than they should be.
Ranjit also understands the financial pressures that each authority faces, the time pressures officers face, and the way each authority works, and responds accordingly.
- Housing
Ranjit is recognised as a leading Housing Law silk by both the Legal 500 and by Chambers & Partners, who note that “He’s prepared to roll up his sleeves, he doesn’t stand around. He gets stuck in and his advice is always very practical and easy to digest” and “He’s always a winner with the clients, providing consistently good results and sound advice”.
Ranjit has been instrumental in shaping and developing housing law over the last 25 years. His ground-breaking use of common law ‘estate wide’ injunctions in the 1990s led directly to Parliament enacting specific statutory powers to combat anti-social behaviour. His High Court statutory nuisance cases dismantled years of widespread (mis)use of the provisions against social landlords, saving millions of pounds of public money. And, following implementation of Decent Homes, he has steered landlords through large numbers of high-value multi-handed major works service charge disputes, with an unprecedented success rate. A recent success has been the key Supreme Court decision of Sims v Dacorum BC, concerning joint tenants’ notices to quit and ECHR compatibility.
Ranjit acts for scores of social landlords, upon each and every aspect of Housing Law, encompassing:
• Strategy
• Vires and Governance
• Development
• Management
• Disposal
• Transfer
• RegulationNo issue is too big or too small. And, because Ranjit has worked for so many social landlords for so many years, he has an acute understanding of their organisations, the competing calls upon them, and the financial and time pressures they work under. This enables him to provide unrivalled, focused, practical advice.
- Court of Appeal confirms that property guardianship companies must licence premises as HMOs27 Oct 2023
- Selective Licensing: No ‘one right answer’ to what is the ‘Part 3’ house to be licensed15 Jul 2022
- Court of Appeal cooks the (Canada) Goose: final injunctions can be granted against ‘newcomers’13 Jan 2022
- A thorough soaking – Court of Appeal affirms that local authority is a water “re-seller”29 Oct 2020
- You are entitled to argue it but you will lose… section 204 appeals, contracting-out, and ratification02 Apr 2020
- Upper Tribunal holds that Framework Agreements are QLTAs: Leaseholders LAPN no longer01 Jan 2018
- Human Rights Challenge to Hammersmith & Fulham BC v Monk to be dismissed by the Supreme Court01 Jan 2018
- Houses in Multiple Occupation: when is a storey not a storey?01 Jan 2018
- Long residence “of little consequence” – the final nail in the coffin for article 8 defences?01 Jan 2018
- Haringey HDV Ruled Lawful01 Jan 2018
- Norton your nelly!01 Jan 2018
- Cornerstone Barristers shortlisted for multiple awards at the Legal 500 Bar Awards09 Jul 2024
- Ranjit Bhose KC to speak at the National Leasehold Group Conference15 Nov 2023
- Cornerstone Barristers retains top ranking in legal directories for Social Housing25 Oct 2023
- Cornerstone Housing Day presentation slides10 Oct 2023
- Cornerstone Housing Newsletter – February 201601 Jan 2018
- Phillips v Francis appeal allowed – the £250 threshold applies ONLY to “sets” of qualifying works01 Jan 2018
- Superstrike Ltd v Rodrigues [2013] EWCA Civ 669; [2013] 1 W.L.R. 3848; [2013] H.L.R. 4201 Jan 2018
- Appeal-proof Homelessness Decisions01 Jan 2018
- Cornerstone Housing Day 2015 – Presentations01 Jan 2018
- Housing Law Update: the essential guide to all the latest changes01 Jan 2018
- Property
Ranjit is recognised by Chambers & Partners as a leading silk in Real Estate Litigation. They describe him as “tenacious, very straightforward and practised in his approach with an ability to handle the clients with ease and comfort”, as well as “incredibly good value. Very commercial and sensible.” He is also recognised as a leading silk by the Legal 500 for Property Litigation, who note that “He has an ability to deal very concisely with complex issues.”
Ranjit’s experience extends through all areas of property, with clients ranging from public authorities, large institutions and developers through to individual property owners and lessees. He has unrivalled experience in service charge law, including – in the residential sector- issues of consultation, QLTA and procurement.
Examples of Ranjit’s recent property work include:
• Defending High Court proceedings against claims for prescriptive rights of way and easements for below and above ground services
• High Court proceedings concerning lease construction, rectification, and consequential rectification of the register
• Property-related negligence claims, including under the defective premises legislation, where major developments have suffered post-completion water defects
• Solicitors’ negligence claims arising from defective drafting of a series of leases and transfers
• Advising developers of a number of different prestige developments on the landlord and tenant issues arising from proposed CHP systems and ESCO agreements
• Advising on the property issues arising from the proposed ‘garden bridge’ on the River Thames
• Advising and acting in a number of claims for forfeiture of commercial leases
• Acting for a tenant seeking a new Part II 1954 Act tenancy of a public park
• Numerous advices on the meaning, enforceability and modification of restrictive covenants in freehold land
• Claims involving the insolvency or striking-off of tenants
• Advising on the extent of the depth of the highway in the context of the proposed placement of installations below its surface- Court of Appeal confirms that property guardianship companies must licence premises as HMOs27 Oct 2023
- Received Wisdom02 May 2023
- Court of Appeal cooks the (Canada) Goose: final injunctions can be granted against ‘newcomers’13 Jan 2022
- Injunctions against protesters: Court of Appeal guidance … and the limits of the jurisdiction05 Mar 2020
- Human Rights Challenge to Hammersmith & Fulham BC v Monk to be dismissed by the Supreme Court01 Jan 2018
- Houses in Multiple Occupation: when is a storey not a storey?01 Jan 2018
- ‘Occupy’ encampment evicted from Finsbury Square01 Jan 2018
- Fabric01 Jan 2018
- Haringey HDV Ruled Lawful01 Jan 2018
- Cornerstone Barristers shortlisted for multiple awards at the Legal 500 Bar Awards09 Jul 2024
- Ranjit Bhose KC to speak at the National Leasehold Group Conference15 Nov 2023
- Cornerstone Barristers nominated for the Legal 500 UK Awards 202027 Nov 2019
- Lawfulness of purchase and sale-back of land in Wales confirmed01 Jan 2018
- Housing Law Update: the essential guide to all the latest changes01 Jan 2018
- Licensing
Ranjit is recognised as a leading silk in Licensing Law by both The Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners. They describe him as “exceptional, and flawless in his delivery of advice to clients” and as “a great team player, a well-judged advocate and extremely nice to work with.”
Ranjit advises and represents both licensing authorities and operators across the spectrum of licensing cases.
In the field of private hire, he acted for Uber London Limited in both of its successful appeals against the refusal by Transport for London of its London PHV operator’s licence in 2017-18 and 2019-20. More recently he acted for Uber in Uber London Limited v Transport for London [2021] EWHC 3290 (Admin) and in Uber Britannia Limited v Sefton BC [2023] EWHC 1975 (KB) which concerned the legality of the ‘agency’ model of operation under the statutes governing PHV licensing in England and Wales.
Under the Licensing Act 2003 he has acted for a number of licensing authorities and operators over the years, including acting for the London Borough of Islington in respect of its revocation of the premises licence for Fabric nightclub.
Ranjit also has a particular specialism in Sexual Entertainment Venue (SEV) law, having appeared for the successful local authorities in the leading cases of R (Thompson) v Oxford CC [2014] EWCA Civ 94 and R (Bean Leisure Trading A Ltd) v Leeds City Council Leeds [2014] EWHC 878 (Admin).
In addition, as a leading public and local government lawyer (again, ranked in both the main directories) he brings his knowledge and experience of consultation, decision-making, policy drafting and implementation, and equalities and ECHR considerations into his licensing practice. This includes defeating a judicial review claim in both the High Court and Court of Appeal which sought to prevent the Wireless Festival from taking place in Finsbury Park. The courts accepted his argument that Haringey Council had power to grant permission to hire out part of the Park under section 145 Local Government Act 1982: R (Friends of Finsbury Park) v LB Haringey [2017] EWCA Civ 1831.
- RCJ considers regulation of PHVs04 Nov 2022
- Selective Licensing: Is there only ever one ‘Part 3 house’?04 Jul 2022
- Divisional Court clarifies rules relating to private hire vehicle operators in London06 Dec 2021
- Uber wins London licensing appeal28 Sep 2020
- Uber London Limited’s appeal against Transport for London to take place in July27 Feb 2020
- Uber London licensing appeal26 Jun 2018
- High Court rules that Wireless 2016 to go ahead01 Jan 2018
- Lap dance no more: Courts affirm wide powers to refuse renewals01 Jan 2018
- Houses in Multiple Occupation: when is a storey not a storey?01 Jan 2018
- Fabric01 Jan 2018
- Court of Appeal dismisses challenge to festivals in parks01 Jan 2018
- Public Law and Judicial Review
Ranjit is ranked by Chambers & Partners as a leading silk for Local Government Law. They say he is “a great advocate who is an expert in the area”.
Given that very many of Ranjit’s clients are local authorities, housing associations, and health bodies it is inevitable that the majority of the decisions they take are subject to the requirements of public law and susceptible to challenge on public law grounds, whether by means of judicial review, statutory appeal, or by the route of ‘public law’ defences in private law proceedings.
Ranjit is highly experienced in guiding public law decision-makers through the process of decision-making, including in devising schemes of lawful consultation, drafting sufficiently reasoned equality impact assessments which go to the heart of the issues in question, and ensuring ECHR compliance. He is adept at advising on and amending draft reports to avoid later pitfalls, including in relation to the giving of lawful reasons.
Clients who have instructed Ranjit from the outset of a project invariably benefit from his active, practical hands-on approach which is designed to remove or limit (so far as is reasonably practicable) the risks of arguable challenges.
Clients also find that Ranjit’s robust and clear style of drafting Pre-Action Protocol Responses and Acknowledgements of Service leads to a high level of success in avoiding legal challenge at all, or the grant of permission to claim judicial review. Given the delays in the Administrative Court listing substantive claims for hearing, the avoidance of the grant of permission is more important now than at any time in the past.
- Abortion clinic “safe access zones” to take effect nationally23 Sep 2024
- Local authority injunctions against “Persons Unknown” – the civil law runs out13 May 2021
- Supreme Court refuses permission to appeal on UK’s first abortion clinic ‘buffer zone’11 Mar 2020
- Court of Appeal upholds the legality of the UK’s first ‘buffer zone’ outside an abortion clinic21 Aug 2019
- High Court rules that Wireless 2016 to go ahead01 Jan 2018
- Tachie (and others) v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council [2013] EWHC 3972 (QB)01 Jan 2018
- Norton your nelly!01 Jan 2018
- Commercial and Regulatory
Ranjit maintains a broad civil litigation practice. He acts for both public and private sector clients. There is often a property-related background to the disputes.
Recent instructions include:
• Advising waste authorities on disputes arising under project agreements for the development and construction of waste transfer stations and related services
• Advising and representing a housing association in an arbitration concerning the construction of a management agreement
• Advising and representing in proceedings for damages brought against construction companies for breach of contract and/or negligence in relation to defective buildings
• Advising and representing in property-related negligence claims, including under the defective premises legislation, where major developments have suffered post-completion water defects
• Solicitors’ negligence claims arising from defective drafting of a series of leases and transfers