Asitha Ranatunga specialises in planning and environment, and licensing law.
Within those fields, his practice incorporates related administrative and public law work. He regularly appears at public inquiries, hearings, and before the higher courts. His clients include developers and individuals as well as local authorities and residents’ groups.
Asitha provides strategic and legal advice across a range of sectors including development (residential, retail, and leisure), infrastructure (renewable energy and highways), and regulatory control (environmental enforcement).
In licensing, Asitha has considerable experience of contested appeals acting for the trade as well as defending licensing authority decisions.
Asitha brings approachability and pragmatism to all of his work and draws on over 20 years’ experience at the Bar. He is consistently ranked as a leading junior in the main guides to the profession:
- “Asitha is an all-round pleasure to work with, with superior expertise in licensing.” Chambers and Partners 2025 (Licensing – Band 1 Ranking)
- “Very eloquent in presenting complex points in simple and very persuasive terms. His licensing knowledge is second to none which allows him to effortlessly deal with any “curve balls” fired in his direction, adding to his persuasiveness.” Legal 500 2025
- “Asitha is conscientious. He has a sound legal mind and is an outstanding advocate’ and has an “exceptional understanding of licensing law and procedure, as well as the ability to provide insightful, bespoke and practical advice.” Legal 500 2024 (Licensing)
- “Asitha is somebody who can provide excellent advice and finds pragmatic solution to the most complicated problem.” Legal 500 2023 (Planning)
- “Exceeds expectation, leaves no stone unturned and has a very good understanding of the client’s needs.” Legal 500 2022 (Planning)
- “He is an excellent advocate, who gives solid, dependable advice.” Chambers and Partners 2020 (Licensing)
- “Great interpersonal skills and has the ability to understand and interpret clients’ requirements.” Legal 500 2020 (Licensing)
Expertise
- Planning & environment
Asitha is regularly instructed to advise and appear in all aspects of planning and environmental litigation. He is often involved in assisting clients through the planning process by providing strategic, legal, and tactical advice and representing clients at public inquiries, hearings, and in the Higher Courts.
Asitha has substantial experience of advising and appearing at s.78 inquiries in relation to residential schemes of varying scales, involving housing land supply, design, landscape & visual, cultural heritage, and related highways issues.
His expertise covers all aspects of the enforcement process and he has considerable experience of appeals involving enforcement notices and other regulatory controls.
Asitha has a substantial grounding in renewable energy litigation having several years of experience defending local authority decisions in relation to windfarms both at inquiries and in the Higher Courts on appeal.
Recent work includes:
- Appearing at s.78 appeals (inquiry and hearing) for Castle Point BC successfully defending its decisions to refuse residential schemes for 455 and 58 units between the settlements of Thundersley and Daws Heath in Benfleet. The appeals involved consideration of Green Belt, Landscape & Visual, and Housing Land Supply issues.
- Appearing at a s.78 appeal for Tonbridge & Malling BC defending its decision to refuse permission for a 24hr Truck Stop facility (197 HGVs) on Green Belt and National Landscape grounds in one of the first appeals following the introduction of the Grey Belt exception policy in NPPF 2024. Appearing for TMBC in the subsequent s.288 proceedings where the High Court considered the Glossary definition of the Grey Belt.
- Appeared for Cambridge CC successfully defending its enforcement notice relating to the erection of “The Cambridge Don” statue in the public realm on the Hills Road in Cambridge. The appeal considered evidence on whether the laying of a plinth and erection of a statue amounted to operational development, whilst the Ground (a) appeal considered the Council’s policy on Art on the public realm, heritage, townscape, and tree issues.
- Successfully appeared for landowners in an enforcement notice appeal against the use of part of their farm business for a construction worker training facility. The Ground (d) appeal considered the effect of the Covid lockdown period and alleged intervening uses across the 10 year immunity period.
- Instructed by Cambridge CC in judicial review proceedings against its decision to grant permission for the demolition and replacement of the library at Christ’s College, within the Historic Core of Cambridge. The challenge has been brought by the Christ’s Lane Action Group based on heritage grounds.
- Advising and appearing in a number of s.187B injunction applications following unauthorised preparatory works with a view to residential development in the open countryside, including the Green Belt.
- Assisting Uttlesford DC (led by Michael Bedford QC), Craven DC (led by Michael Bedford QC), North East Derbyshire DC, and South Norfolk DC through the Local Plan examination process.
Asitha is recommended in Chambers and Partners and Legal 500 as a leading junior in Planning.
- Asitha Ranatunga and Alex Williams involved in early Grey Belt appeal08 Jan 2025
- Court of Appeal clarifies the ambit of Welsh Ministers’ powers over coal mining23 Feb 2024
- R (Miles) v Tonbridge & Malling BC et al. [2020] EWHC 1608 (Admin)23 Jun 2020
- Appeals by Liberty UK Ltd. relating to Kings Hill, West Malling, Kent (APP/H2265/W/19/3235165-7, 71)14 Feb 2020
- 10 Midland Road, Luton, Bedfordshire (APP/B0230/W/19/3235438)16 Jan 2020
- Land at Windacres Farm, Church Street, Rudgwick, Surrey (APP/R3650/W/19/3230164)15 Nov 2019
- Court of Appeal dismisses Waverley Local Plan challenges01 Nov 2019
- Land to the South of Cox Green Road, Rudgwick, Surrey (APP/R3650/W/19/3227970)16 Sep 2019
- Rival crematorium challenge defeated in High Court31 Jul 2019
- District Judge dismisses Improvement Notice prosecution under the Housing Act 200428 Jun 2019
- High Court dismisses planning fraud claim08 May 2019
- Confiscation order appeal allowed27 Feb 2019
- Land to the rear of 237-259 London Road, West Malling, Kent (APP/H2265/W/18/3202040)19 Dec 2018
- High Court dismisses Waverley Local Plan challenges06 Nov 2018
- Land at Chestnut Avenue and Octagon Road, Whiteley Village, Surrey (APP/K3605/W/18/3193937)12 Oct 2018
- Land on East Side of Green Road, Woolpit, Suffolk (APP/W3520/W/18/3194926)28 Sep 2018
- High Court quashes grant of permission for onshore windfarm01 Jan 2018
- New Planning Court signals its intent01 Jan 2018
- Planning Balance Weighs Against Hempnall Wind Farm01 Jan 2018
- Chalfont St. Peter PC V Chiltern DC, Holy Cross Sisters Trustees Inc. [2014] EWCA Civ 1393, October 201401 Jan 2018
- Hempnall, Appeal By Streetwood Wind Farm Norfolk Ltd., October 201401 Jan 2018
- Court Of Appeal Dismisses Core Strategy And Judicial Review Challenges Based On Reasonable Alternatives, Reasons, Error Of Fact, Interpretation Of Development Plan Policy, And The Meaning Of ‘Playing Field’01 Jan 2018
- Land East Of East Delph, Whittlesey, Appeal By Showfields Ltd., November 201401 Jan 2018
- Examination of South Norfolk Local Plans, 201401 Jan 2018
- Winning The Wind Farm War: Secretary Of State Refuses Permission For Spring Farm Ridge Wind Farm01 Jan 2018
- South Northamptonshire District Council V Secretary Of State (December 2012)01 Jan 2018
- Appeal By Travis Perkins (Properties) Ltd. – Dairy Crest Site (September 2012) This public inquiry considered an appeal against the refusal of the Council to grant01 Jan 2018
- Malvern Mansions Limited V The London Borough Of Islington, High Court, Queen’s Bench Division, April 201201 Jan 2018
- Appeal By TCI Renewables Ltd. (April 2012)01 Jan 2018
- R (Dignity Funerals Ltd.) V Fenland District Council, Memoria Limited CO/7744/201101 Jan 2018
- Appeals By RES UK & Ireland Ltd. And EON Climate And Renewables UK Development Ltd. (February 2012) (Jack’s Lane And Chiplow Wind Farms)01 Jan 2018
- Pickles Overrules Inspector Over Three Norfolk Turbines01 Jan 2018
- Development Corporation defeats Mega Church’s Olympic relocation bid on appeal01 Jan 2018
- Hart DC v (1) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, (2) Luckmore Ltd., (3) Barratt Homes Ltd [2008] EWHC 1204 (Admin)01 Jan 2018
- Redress for abuse of the planning system01 Jan 2018
- Cornerstone Barristers achieves record results in Chambers UK Bar Directory 2024 for Planning and Environment24 Oct 2023
- Cornerstone Planning Team recommended as a leading set for planning in The Legal 500 2024 guide05 Oct 2023
- Cornerstone Planning Day 2021 – Tickets available20 Sep 2021
- Advising Planning Committees on the costs consequences of their decisions16 Jul 2020
- Spring Farm Ridge, Appeal by Broadview Energy Ltd., December 201401 Jan 2018
- PEBA National Conference 201701 Jan 2018
- Licensing
Asitha’s expertise in licensing takes him across the country acting both for the trade and local authorities. He has substantial Magistrates’ Court experience of defending licensing authority decisions on appeal, and appears regularly for the trade both before licensing sub-committees and on appeal for all types of premises (pubs, clubs, off-licences, academic institutions). He is principally involved in alcohol and public entertainment matters under the Licensing Act 2003, and also in taxi and gambling litigation.
Asitha has frequently sat as legal advisor and represented the licensing authority before Licensing Sub-Committees. He is appointed to the Metropolitan Police’s panel of Counsel.
Notable / recent work includes:
- Secured a variation for Stanley’s, a new rooftop bar (capacity 60) at the Chesterfield, a distinguished hotel in the heart of Mayfair in the face of opposition from Environmental Health and two Resident Associations. Led by Stephen Walsh KC.
- Defended at appeal Haringey Council’s decision to refuse a variation allowing an Adult Gaming Centre in the heart of the busy Green Lanes area to operate on a 24hr basis. The appeal was heard before a District Judge at Highbury Corner and considered evidence from the Council’s Director of Public Health on gambling related harm in the area.
- Appeared for Thanet DC as Licensing Authority in Police review proceedings following the drug-related death of a 17 year old at a music event at Dreamland in Margate.
- Defended Islington Council’s decision to impose stringent conditions on the operation of The Sekforde (a Grade II listed pub in Clerkenwell, refurbished at considerable cost), following a review brought by Environmental Health.
- Represented the Metropolitan Police in the summary review of Fabric’s premises licence following the drug-related deaths of two customers in Islington, and the review of The Mother Bar in Shoreditch.
- Standing Counsel for Addison Lee Ltd. on all regulatory licensing matters, including the opening of their operating centre in Peterborough.
- Defended at appeal Eastbourne BC’s decision to revoke (with immediate effect) a combined private hire and hackney carriage driver’s licence following an altercation between driver and prospective customer on the station taxi rank. Currently the subject of a case stated appeal.
Asitha is recommended in Chambers and Partners and Legal 500 as a leading junior in licensing.
- Michael Caines’ new venture on Exmouth seafront granted premises licence10 May 2021
- Miah and Ullah v Brentwood BC (The Raj, Brentwood)21 Oct 2019
- The Mother Bar, 333 Old Street, Shoreditch, London27 Jun 2019
- Whalley v Chesterfield BC21 Jan 2019
- Live Nation (Music) UK Ltd. v LB Haringey (Wireless Festival, Finsbury Park)08 Jan 2019
- Saint Event Services Ltd. v LB Islington (Club Reina, Clerkenwell)03 Sep 2018
- Beronmoor Ltd. v LB Islington (The Winchester, Angel)28 Aug 2018
- Farringdon Pub Ltd. v LB Islington (The Coach & Horses, Farringdon)01 Aug 2018
- Boujis’ nightclub licence suspended after major disorder01 Jan 2018
- Summary Reviews: when are licensed premises ‘associated with’ serious crime?01 Jan 2018
- Hypermarket, 327 Lincoln Road, Peterborough, October 201401 Jan 2018
- Elements Nightclub, Bedford, September 201401 Jan 2018
- Carter (Bar Centro) V Chesterfield BC, May 201401 Jan 2018
- Lalli (William The Conqueror) V MPS, LB Newham, [2015] EWHC 14 (Admin), January 201501 Jan 2018
- HD Festival – Forest Farm (December 2013)01 Jan 2018
- Electric Star Limited V LB Islington June 201301 Jan 2018
- Greene King Ltd. V Bedford Borough Council (December 2012)01 Jan 2018
- Application For Review Of Premises Licence (Following Summary Review Application) At Proud2, O2 Centre, London (October 2012)01 Jan 2018
- Fevzi Yeter V London Borough Of Islington (July 2012)01 Jan 2018
- Carumi Ltd. V London Borough Of Lambeth (July 2012)01 Jan 2018
- University Of Brighton – Varley Halls Of Residence (June 2012)01 Jan 2018
- Fabric01 Jan 2018
- Public law & judicial review
A high proportion of Asitha’s work involves acting both for and against public bodies. As such, he has experience of public law challenges to the decisions of such bodies. Asitha is regularly instructed in relation to statutory appeals and judicial review applications within his practice areas of Planning & Environmental and Licensing.
Notable/recent work includes:
Wrotham Parish Council v SSHCLG, Moto Hospitality Ltd, Tonbridge & Malling BC (Planning Court) AC-2025-LON-000898
Appeared for TMBC supporting the Claimant’s s.288 appeal relating to the interpretation of the Glossary definition of the Grey Belt in NPPF 2024.
R (Christ’s Lane Action Group) v Cambridge CC, Christ’s College Cambridge AC-2025-LON-004656
Instructed by Cambridge CC to defend its decision to grant permission for the demolition and replacement of a library at Christ’s College Cambridge. The grounds are based on the assessment of the heritage aspects of the application.
R (Fews Lane Consortium Ltd) v South Cambridgeshire DC CO/608/2020 (Planning Court)
Successfully defended (leave stage) a challenge brought by a residents’ group involving the Council’s scheme of delegation.
R (Dignity Funerals Ltd) v Huntingdonshire DC [2019] EWHC 2114 (Admin) (Planning Court)
Successfully defended judicial review proceedings against Huntingdonshire DC’s decision to grant planning permission for a crematorium promoted by the local Town Council, in a claim brought by a rival crematorium developer.
CPRE, POW Campaign Ltd v Waverley BC [2019] EWCA Civ 1826
Successfully defended Waverley’s Local Plan against appeals claiming that the Examining Inspector’s approach to assessing unmet need in the Housing Market Area had been flawed. The Court also considered the question of the standard of reasons in Local Plan Decisions. Led by Wayne Beglan.
Chalfont St Peter Parish Council v Holy Cross Sisters Trustees Inc [2019] EWHC 1128 (QB)
Successfully defended an Order of Roman Catholic nuns from a damages claim for alleged conspiracy to injure arising from representations made on their behalf in support of a contentious planning application for a 200 unit housing scheme on the Order’s former school site in Chalfont St. Peter. Two-week fraud trial. Led by Philip Coppel QC.
R (Bond) v Powys CC et al. CO/3881/2019 (Planning Court)
On behalf of Powys CC, successfully defended (leave stage) the grant of permission for the erection of a poultry unit and associated works in Presteigne near the village of Norton.
R (Lonsdale) v Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court, LB Islington at al. CO/2816/2019
Successfully defended (leave stage) preliminary rulings made by a District Judge in the course of a licensing appeal relating to the authority of an officer to initiate the review procedure, the requirement to disclose a representation, and non-compliance with service provisions.
R (Lalli) v Metropolitan Police (1), LB Newham (2) [2015] EWHC 14 (Admin)
Judicial Review involving the proper interpretation of the summary review provisions under s.53A of the Licensing Act 2003. Licensed premises could be “associated with” serious crime or serious disorder on the basis of a single incident. Led by Philip Kolvin QC.
R (Chalfont St Peter PC) v Chiltern DC [2014] EWCA Civ 1393
Judicial Review involving the proper interpretation of development plan policy and mistake of fact. Led by Mark Lowe QC.
South Northamptonshire Council v SOSCLG [2013] EWHC 11 (Admin)
Section 288 appeal involving the proper approach to the statutory development plan in decision making.
Macarthur v SOSCLG [2013] EWHC 3 (Admin)
Section 288 appeal involving mistake of fact and evidence given during cross-examination at a planning inquiry.
Robertson v Manchester Airport Plc [2010] UKUT 370 (LC)
Compensation case involving the depreciation in value of two properties impacted by noise resulting from the second runway at Manchester Airport.
R (Friends of Hethel Ltd) v South Norfolk DC [2010] EWCA Civ 894
Judicial review involving the Council’s scheme of delegation, terms of reference for area planning committees, and majority voting requirements under Sched. 12 of the Local Government Act 1972
St Albans City and DC v Patel [2008] EWHC 2767 (Admin)
A Magistrates’ Court had not failed to apply the proper test of best practicable means under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 s.80(7) in holding that a pub owner had established the statutory defence against the contravention of a noise abatement notice.
- Asitha Ranatunga and Alex Williams involved in early Grey Belt appeal08 Jan 2025
- Court of Appeal clarifies the ambit of Welsh Ministers’ powers over coal mining23 Feb 2024
- Court of Appeal to consider scope of Welsh Ministers’ power to refuse further coal-mining operations06 Feb 2024
- R (Miles) v Tonbridge & Malling BC et al. [2020] EWHC 1608 (Admin)23 Jun 2020
- Court of Appeal dismisses Waverley Local Plan challenges01 Nov 2019
- Rival crematorium challenge defeated in High Court31 Jul 2019
- High Court dismisses planning fraud claim08 May 2019
- Confiscation order appeal allowed27 Feb 2019
- High Court dismisses Waverley Local Plan challenges06 Nov 2018
- Redress for abuse of the planning system01 Jan 2018




