Ruchi Parekh has a broad public law practice with particular expertise in planning and environment, information, local government and election law. She is ranked in the legal directories across four practice areas: administrative law and human rights; planning; environment; and data protection. She is a member of the Attorney General’s B Panel of Counsel, promoted from the C Panel after two years.
Ruchi was recognised in The Planner’s Women of Influence in 2023 and was named in the 2023 ENDS Report’s Power List of the most influential environmental professionals in the UK – one of only three barristers to feature on the list. She was shortlisted in the Diversity and Inclusion: Future Leader category at the Chambers UK Bar Awards 2023.
Ruchi also has experience in a range of related areas including education, licensing, and housing law. She is regularly instructed by public bodies, including central and local government, NGOs, private clients and community groups.
Ruchi has an LLM from Harvard Law School, where she was awarded a Public Service Fellowship, and an LLB (First Class Honours) from the London School of Economics, where she won several prizes including two for best overall performance in the year. Ruchi was awarded the Stephen Chapman Scholarship from Inner Temple.
Ruchi’s previous experience includes human rights litigation in domestic courts in eastern Europe and southern and eastern Africa, and the European Court of Human Rights, while working at Interights. She provided advice and training to NGOs and has conducted workshops in Ukraine and Georgia on international human rights standards.
Prior to coming to the bar, Ruchi worked as a legal officer at JUSTICE for two years, where she led the civil justice program. Her work included co-authoring Delivering Justice in an Age of Austerity (with Sir Stanley Burnton) on the reform of the civil courts and tribunals.
Ruchi was an Associate Editor of New York University Law School’s legal blog, Just Security, and a Teaching Fellow at the School of Oriental and African Studies. She has also worked with Harvard Law School’s International Human Rights Clinic and the Constitution Unit (UCL).
Expertise
- Public Law and Judicial Review
Ruchi has a broad administrative and public law practice, and regularly advises and represents both public bodies and private clients in this area. Her experience spans environment, planning, local government, information, education, housing, licensing and election law. She is a member of the Attorney General’s B Panel of Counsel.
Ongoing and recent notable cases include:
- Representing Weald Action Group in the Supreme Court in the internationally important Finch case concerning downstream greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel development.
- Representing the claimant group challenging the grant of development consent for the Sizewell C nuclear power station (led by David Wolfe KC)
- Representing the community group challenging the ‘Jet Zero Strategy’, the Government’s plan to achieve net zero in the aviation industry (led by Estelle Dehon KC)
- R (CDE) v Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council [2023] EWHC 194 (Admin): the first High Court ruling on the interaction between the Public Sector Equality Duty and licensing of sexual entertainment venues (led by Josef Cannon).
- Moss v Kingston-upon-Thames RBC [2021] EWHC 1032 (Admin): Leading authority establishing that the right of inspection in respect of local authority accounts is not limited by reference to the time or cost of compliance (led by Ranjit Bhose KC).
- Taylor v Slough BC [2020] EWHC 3520 (Ch): Successfully defending an appeal against a possession order, focused on the Public Sector Equality Duty and the issue of ‘late compliance’ in a social housing context.
- Kingston-upon-Thames RLBC v Moss [2020] EWCA Civ 1381: Test case (on behalf of a consortium of London boroughs) challenging the decision in Jones v London Borough of Southwark on water re-selling (led by Ranjit Bhose KC).
- Christian Peoples Alliance v The Electoral Commission (2019) (Case no. E40CL201): Successfully defending a statutory appeal against the imposition of discretionary monetary penalties for failures to comply with statutory requirements during the 2017 General Election.
- Upson v Mitchell [2019] EWHC 3517 (QB): Successfully defending an election petition which sought to challenge the validity of a town council election result.
- Kitchener-Pope v Governing Body of Peacehaven Community School [2019] EWHC 2666 (Admin): Representing the successful Academy Trust in defeating a judicial review claim challenging the decision to convert a school into an academy.
- Powell v Dacorum BC [2019] EWCA Civ 23: Leading appellate ruling on the context-specific nature of the Public Sector Equality Duty (led by Andrew Lane).
- R (Peters) v Haringey LBC [2018] EWHC 192 (Admin): Successfully defending the lawfulness of the Haringey Development Vehicle, in the first High Court ruling on the scope of ‘commercial purpose’ in the context of the ‘general power of competence’ (led by Ranjit Bhose KC).
Ruchi is able to advise public body clients at all stages of decision-making, including in relation to equality impact assessments and the proper discharge of its public law duties.
She was part of the Cornerstone team advising the Department of Media, Culture and Sport on the implementation of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation into domestic law. She was also part of the legal team for the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea ahead of the public inquiry into the Grenfell Tower tragedy.
- Government’s Jet Zero Policy Under Judicial Review in High Court This Week31 Mar 2025
- Permission for New North Sea Oilfields Quashed in Another Interesting Analysis of Remedy30 Jan 2025
- Court of Appeal challenge to a planning permission for a hydrocarbon development28 Jan 2025
- Secretary of State accepts legal error and proposes that permission for controversial coal mine be quashed, but developer fights on12 Jul 2024
- Finch vs Surrey County Council: In groundbreaking decision, Supreme Court rules the grant of planning permission for oil production was unlawful for failing to assess the ‘downstream’ greenhouse gas emissions20 Jun 2024
- Court of Appeal to consider approach to planning applications relating to exploration for and production of hydrocarbons14 May 2024
- Government to reconsider mandatory reporting for food waste06 Dec 2023
- High Court considers lawfulness of new offshore oil and gas drilling in the North Sea25 Jul 2023
- Court of Appeal emphasises distinction between the interpretation and application of planning policy31 Oct 2022
- ‘Out-of-date’ assessments can be site specific, Holgate J confirms16 Feb 2021
- Southwark Gets Tough on Affordable Housing Pledges Again01 Jan 2018
- Court of Appeal Dismisses Appeal by Frack Free Balcombe Residents’ Association17 Apr 2025
- Recognition for Finch Litigation at the LexisNexis Legal Awards 202514 Mar 2025
- Permission for New North Sea Oilfields Quashed in Another Interesting Analysis of Remedy30 Jan 2025
- Court of Appeal challenge to a planning permission for a hydrocarbon development28 Jan 2025
- Finch case shortlisted for Case of the Year at LexisNexis Awards 202517 Jan 2025
- Chambers UK Bar 2025: Cornerstone Barristers achieve 75 individual rankings across 15 practice areas 17 Oct 2024
- Cornerstone Barristers continues to be ranked as one of the leading sets at the Bar in the 2025 edition of the Legal 50002 Oct 2024
- The Return of Onshore Wind09 Jul 2024
- Finch vs Surrey County Council: In groundbreaking decision, Supreme Court rules the grant of planning permission for oil production was unlawful for failing to assess the ‘downstream’ greenhouse gas emissions20 Jun 2024
- Finch v Surrey County Council: Supreme Court to hand down judgment in appeal concerning downstream emissions of fossil fuel projects18 Jun 2024
- Cornerstone Barristers at UKELA Annual Conference 202412 Jun 2024
- Government to reconsider mandatory reporting for food waste06 Dec 2023
- Emma Dring and Ruchi Parekh appointed to the Attorney General’s B Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown, with Rowan Clapp appointed to C Panel02 Aug 2023
- High Court to consider Government’s decision to endorse new offshore oil and gas licensing round25 Apr 2023
- NEW BRIEFING – Local authorities post COVID-19. All you need to know01 Jul 2020
- How to (lawfully) rename streets and remove statues23 Jun 2020
- Remote meetings: FAQs17 Apr 2020
- PSED essential reading: lessons learned from L&Q v Patrick30 May 2019
- Rosewell Review: planning inquiries are here to stay13 Feb 2019
- Parliamentary Inquiry into Prostitution01 Jan 2018
- Cornerstone Housing Newsletter – May 201601 Jan 2018
- Planning and Environment
Ruchi has a broad planning law practice spanning judicial reviews, statutory appeals and planning inquiries. She is regularly instructed by central and local government, NGOs, developers and resident groups across the full range of planning, environment and highway matters. She is ranked as a leading junior in Legal 500 in both environment and planning law.
Ruchi’s experience includes large residential and retail schemes as well as nationally significant infrastructure projects (NSIPs). She has particular expertise in matters related to climate change and renewable energy. She has advised on various issues, including policy interpretation, affordable housing requirements, neighbourhood development plans, enforcement, section 106 agreements, and the Public Sector Equality Duty (which has played an increasingly important role in planning law in recent years).
Recent and ongoing court cases include:
- Representing the claimant group challenging the grant of development consent for the Sizewell C nuclear power station (with Dr Ashley Bowes, led by David Wolfe KC)
- Representing the community group challenging the ‘Jet Zero Strategy’, the Government’s plan to achieve net zero in the aviation industry (led by Estelle Dehon KC)
- Armstrong v SSLUHC [2023] EWHC 176 (Admin): Leading authority on the scope of s.73 TCPA 1990 and whether it extends to a “fundamental variation” of the original planning permission.
- R (Addison) v Southwark LBC [2022] EWHC 3211 (Admin): Challenging the redevelopment of Dulwich Hamlet Football Club, which would result in the loss of a well-loved community pitch.
- R (Thurston Parish Council) v Mid Suffolk DC [2022] EWCA Civ 1417: Successfully defending outline planning permission for a 210-dwelling scheme, in a key judgment emphasising the distinction between the interpretation and application of planning policy (led by Tom Cosgrove KC).
- R (SPVRG Ltd) v Pembrokeshire CC [2022] EWHC 143 (Admin): Successfully defending a s.73 permission for a holiday caravan park (led by James Findlay KC).
- R (Ewans) v Mid Suffolk DC [2021] EWHC 511 (Admin): Successfully defending outline planning permission for a 300-dwelling development outside the established village settlement boundary (led by Tom Cosgrove KC).
- R (Chapman) v West Suffolk DC CO/4455/2020. Defending a judicial review challenge against the alleged failure to properly assess impacts on designated heritage assets.
- R (Powell) v Herefordshire Council CO/3109/2018. Representing local residents in successfully quashing planning permission for residential development where the planning authority had been misled about the weight to be attributed to an emerging neighbourhood plan.
- Representing a highway authority in a dispute over the highway status of a highly contested parcel of land (led by James Findlay KC).
Recent and ongoing Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) include:
- Sunnica solar farm in Suffolk and Cambridgeshire (representing the host local planning authority).
- Sizewell C nuclear power station (with Dr Ashley Bowes) (representing the local community group).
- East Anglia ONE North and TWO offshore windfarms (with Michael Bedford KC) (representing the host county council).
Recent inquiries and hearings include:
- Two-week inquiry successfully resisting retail development in the setting of a conservation area (led by Richard Ground KC).
- Representing a local authority, in support of the Environment Agency, in resisting redevelopment on a site known for historic groundwater pollution.
- Resisting an extension to a chapel to provide a new crematorium, with a focus on the proper interpretation of national policy on the extension of buildings in the Green Belt.
- Acting in numerous appeals against enforcement notices as well as refusals of lawful development certificates.
- Government’s Jet Zero Policy Under Judicial Review in High Court This Week31 Mar 2025
- Inquiry Into Leeds Bradford Airport Night Flights Begins11 Mar 2025
- Permission for New North Sea Oilfields Quashed in Another Interesting Analysis of Remedy30 Jan 2025
- Court of Appeal challenge to a planning permission for a hydrocarbon development28 Jan 2025
- The four-week examination into the West Suffolk Local Plan07 Nov 2024
- Secretary of State accepts legal error and proposes that permission for controversial coal mine be quashed, but developer fights on12 Jul 2024
- Finch vs Surrey County Council: In groundbreaking decision, Supreme Court rules the grant of planning permission for oil production was unlawful for failing to assess the ‘downstream’ greenhouse gas emissions20 Jun 2024
- Court of Appeal to consider approach to planning applications relating to exploration for and production of hydrocarbons14 May 2024
- Government to reconsider mandatory reporting for food waste06 Dec 2023
- Court of Appeal considers Sizewell C nuclear power station legal challenge01 Nov 2023
- Government’s new offshore oil and gas licensing round is lawful, rules Holgate J19 Oct 2023
- Finch v Surrey County Council: Supreme Court to hear appeal concerning downstream emissions of fossil fuel projects20 Jun 2023
- Court of Appeal emphasises distinction between the interpretation and application of planning policy31 Oct 2022
- CoA continues to grapple with nuances of planning policy interpretation and application19 Oct 2022
- Legal action threatened over week-long consultation on large new oil and gas subsidy05 Jul 2022
- Extensions in the Green Belt and material changes of use – what’s the proper approach?16 Apr 2021
- ‘Out-of-date’ assessments can be site specific, Holgate J confirms16 Feb 2021
- Court of Appeal Dismisses Appeal by Frack Free Balcombe Residents’ Association17 Apr 2025
- Recognition for Finch Litigation at the LexisNexis Legal Awards 202514 Mar 2025
- Permission for New North Sea Oilfields Quashed in Another Interesting Analysis of Remedy30 Jan 2025
- Court of Appeal challenge to a planning permission for a hydrocarbon development28 Jan 2025
- Finch case shortlisted for Case of the Year at LexisNexis Awards 202517 Jan 2025
- Chambers UK Bar 2025: Cornerstone Barristers achieve 75 individual rankings across 15 practice areas 17 Oct 2024
- Cornerstone Barristers continues to be ranked as one of the leading sets at the Bar in the 2025 edition of the Legal 50002 Oct 2024
- The Return of Onshore Wind09 Jul 2024
- Finch vs Surrey County Council: In groundbreaking decision, Supreme Court rules the grant of planning permission for oil production was unlawful for failing to assess the ‘downstream’ greenhouse gas emissions20 Jun 2024
- Finch v Surrey County Council: Supreme Court to hand down judgment in appeal concerning downstream emissions of fossil fuel projects18 Jun 2024
- Cornerstone Barristers at UKELA Annual Conference 202412 Jun 2024
- Ruchi Parekh to speak on 24th April 2024 on “The Climate Change Act at 15: UK climate action at a crossroads”17 Apr 2024
- Cornerstone Barristers at MIPIM 202412 Feb 2024
- Ruchi Parekh to speak at ‘Climate Commitment: Holding the Government Accountable on Net-Zero’ event12 Jan 2024
- Government to reconsider mandatory reporting for food waste06 Dec 2023
- Cornerstone Barristers achieves record results in Chambers UK Bar Directory 2024 for Planning and Environment24 Oct 2023
- Cornerstone Barristers ranked as a leading set by Chambers & Partners 202419 Oct 2023
- Cornerstone Planning Team recommended as a leading set for planning in The Legal 500 2024 guide05 Oct 2023
- Tom Cosgrove KC and Ruchi Parekh are shortlisted at the Chambers UK Bar Awards 202311 Sep 2023
- Estelle Dehon KC and Ruchi Parekh, of Cornerstone Barristers, Both Recognised in ENDS Power List 202324 May 2023
- High Court to consider Government’s decision to endorse new offshore oil and gas licensing round25 Apr 2023
- Net Zero Strategy 2.0: Into the Multiverse11 Apr 2023
- Estelle Dehon KC and Ruchi Parekh recognised in The Planner’s Women of Influence in 202308 Mar 2023
- Examination into the largest solar farm in the uk26 Jul 2022
- Briefing note on the Climate Change implications for local government across the UK24 Nov 2021
- Cornerstone Planning Day 2021 – Tickets available20 Sep 2021
- Cornerstone Barristers’ Ruchi Parekh Speaks at UKELA Annual Conference 202115 Jun 2021
- NEW BRIEFING – Local authorities post COVID-19. All you need to know01 Jul 2020
- Cornerstone Barristers Planning Bulletin – Issue 214 Apr 2020
- Rosewell Review: planning inquiries are here to stay13 Feb 2019
- Response to the Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee’s inquiry on fracking24 Apr 2018
- Cornerstone Climate
Ruchi specialises in matters relating to the climate, ranging from renewable and low carbon energy infrastructure to judicial review challenges based on climate grounds. She is committed to working with government, NGOs, developers and resident groups across a range of climate issues to achieve sustainable outcomes. In recognition of her work in this field, Ruchi was named in the 2023 ENDS Report’s Power List of the most influential environmental professionals in the UK – one of only three barristers to be included.
Ruchi is a member of the Cornerstone Climate team
Recent and ongoing notable cases include:
- Advising Uplift (a not-for-profit initiative) on numerous offshore oil and gas projects, such as the Cambo, Jackdaw and Rosebank fields.
- Advising and representing various parties in ‘Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects’ including two offshore windfarms (with Michael Bedford KC); the Sizewell C nuclear power station and Sunnica solar farm (the largest solar proposal in the country).
- Representing the Appellant in the first Supreme Court case concerning downstream greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel development (led by Estelle Dehon KC and Marc Willers KC).
- Representing the claimant group challenging the grant of development consent for the Sizewell C nuclear power station (with Dr Ashley Bowes, led by David Wolfe KC).
- Representing the community group challenging the Jet Zero Strategy, the Government’s plan to achieve net zero in the aviation industry (led by Estelle Dehon KC).
- Representing Uplift in a challenge to the Government’s new offshore oil and gas licensing round, which could result in the award of more than 100 new licences in the North Sea (led by Estelle Dehon KC).
- Government’s Jet Zero Policy Under Judicial Review in High Court This Week31 Mar 2025
- Permission for New North Sea Oilfields Quashed in Another Interesting Analysis of Remedy30 Jan 2025
- Court of Appeal challenge to a planning permission for a hydrocarbon development28 Jan 2025
- Secretary of State accepts legal error and proposes that permission for controversial coal mine be quashed, but developer fights on12 Jul 2024
- Finch vs Surrey County Council: In groundbreaking decision, Supreme Court rules the grant of planning permission for oil production was unlawful for failing to assess the ‘downstream’ greenhouse gas emissions20 Jun 2024
- Court of Appeal to consider approach to planning applications relating to exploration for and production of hydrocarbons14 May 2024
- Government to reconsider mandatory reporting for food waste06 Dec 2023
- Court of Appeal considers Sizewell C nuclear power station legal challenge01 Nov 2023
- Government’s new offshore oil and gas licensing round is lawful, rules Holgate J19 Oct 2023
- High Court considers lawfulness of new offshore oil and gas drilling in the North Sea25 Jul 2023
- Finch v Surrey County Council: Supreme Court to hear appeal concerning downstream emissions of fossil fuel projects20 Jun 2023
- ‘Out-of-date’ assessments can be site specific, Holgate J confirms16 Feb 2021
- Court of Appeal Dismisses Appeal by Frack Free Balcombe Residents’ Association17 Apr 2025
- Recognition for Finch Litigation at the LexisNexis Legal Awards 202514 Mar 2025
- Permission for New North Sea Oilfields Quashed in Another Interesting Analysis of Remedy30 Jan 2025
- Court of Appeal challenge to a planning permission for a hydrocarbon development28 Jan 2025
- Finch case shortlisted for Case of the Year at LexisNexis Awards 202517 Jan 2025
- Chambers UK Bar 2025: Cornerstone Barristers achieve 75 individual rankings across 15 practice areas 17 Oct 2024
- The Return of Onshore Wind09 Jul 2024
- Finch vs Surrey County Council: In groundbreaking decision, Supreme Court rules the grant of planning permission for oil production was unlawful for failing to assess the ‘downstream’ greenhouse gas emissions20 Jun 2024
- Finch v Surrey County Council: Supreme Court to hand down judgment in appeal concerning downstream emissions of fossil fuel projects18 Jun 2024
- Cornerstone Barristers at UKELA Annual Conference 202412 Jun 2024
- Cornerstone Barristers at MIPIM 202412 Feb 2024
- Ruchi Parekh to speak at ‘Climate Commitment: Holding the Government Accountable on Net-Zero’ event12 Jan 2024
- Government to reconsider mandatory reporting for food waste06 Dec 2023
- Can litigation solve the climate crisis?26 Oct 2023
- Cornerstone Barristers achieves record results in Chambers UK Bar Directory 2024 for Planning and Environment24 Oct 2023
- Introducing Cornerstone Climate – a new centre of excellence for climate litigation and advice19 Jun 2023
- Estelle Dehon KC and Ruchi Parekh, of Cornerstone Barristers, Both Recognised in ENDS Power List 202324 May 2023
- Net Zero Strategy 2.0: Into the Multiverse11 Apr 2023
- Briefing note on the Climate Change implications for local government across the UK24 Nov 2021
- Information Law
Ruchi is experienced in information law and is regularly instructed to advise and represent both private clients and public bodies in this field. Recent notable cases include Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens RTM Co Ltd & Ors (Court of Appeal) (led by Philip Coppel KC) on the scope of the subject access request provisions in the DPA 1998.
Ruchi has advised a number of clients – including local authorities, private companies and sole traders – on preparing for the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and can provide bespoke training in this area.
She frequently advises local authority clients on issues arising from requests for information (under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 as well as the Environmental Information Regulations).
Ruchi was also part of the Cornerstone team advising the Department of Culture, Media and Sport on the implementation of the GDPR into domestic law.
- Chambers UK Bar 2025: Cornerstone Barristers achieve 75 individual rankings across 15 practice areas 17 Oct 2024
- Cornerstone Barristers ranked as a leading set by Chambers & Partners 202419 Oct 2023
- How can data and A.I. be used responsibly in the public sector?11 Jul 2023
- NEW BRIEFING – Local authorities post COVID-19. All you need to know01 Jul 2020